Introduction: Evidence on the long-term durability of glycemic control beyond the first year of automated insulin delivery therapy remains limited, particularly in large multicenter pediatric cohorts. The present study aimed to evaluate long-term effectiveness and identify determinants of sustained optimal outcomes over 3 years of MiniMed™ 780G use in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods: In this longitudinal, multicenter, real-world study, 359 youth with T1D (median age 12.2 years, 50.9% female) from 20 Italian pediatric diabetes centers were followed for 3 years after MiniMed 780G initiation. Glucose metrics, insulin delivery parameters, device settings, and engagement indicators were analyzed at 1, 2, and 3 years. Longitudinal changes were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of achieving time in tight range target (TITR ≥ 50%) at 3 years. Results: Median time in range (TIR) remained within international targets but declined modestly from 75% at 1 year to 74% at 3 years (P = 0.002). The percentage of automatic correction boluses increased over time, whereas user-initiated boluses and carbohydrate entries declined (P < 0.001). Youth with higher TIR at 1 year showed a progressive reduction in TIR and greater increase in automated corrections (time × group interaction P < 0.001). At 3 years, higher SmartGuard use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.23; P = 0.007), optimal system settings (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.33–7.77; P = 0.010), and lower automatic correction boluses (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89; P < 0.001) were independently associated with achieving TITR ≥50%. Conclusions: MiniMed 780G provides sustained glycemic control over 3 years. However, progressive reliance on automated corrections and reduced user engagement may attenuate tight glycemic control, highlighting the need for ongoing education and proactive device optimization.

Three-Year Durability of Automated Insulin Delivery Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicenter Real-World Study / B. Bombaci, F.L.. - In: DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 1557-8593. - (2026), pp. 15209156261469663.1-15209156261469663.9. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/15209156261469663]

Three-Year Durability of Automated Insulin Delivery Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicenter Real-World Study

C. Mameli;G. Zuccotti;
2026

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence on the long-term durability of glycemic control beyond the first year of automated insulin delivery therapy remains limited, particularly in large multicenter pediatric cohorts. The present study aimed to evaluate long-term effectiveness and identify determinants of sustained optimal outcomes over 3 years of MiniMed™ 780G use in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods: In this longitudinal, multicenter, real-world study, 359 youth with T1D (median age 12.2 years, 50.9% female) from 20 Italian pediatric diabetes centers were followed for 3 years after MiniMed 780G initiation. Glucose metrics, insulin delivery parameters, device settings, and engagement indicators were analyzed at 1, 2, and 3 years. Longitudinal changes were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of achieving time in tight range target (TITR ≥ 50%) at 3 years. Results: Median time in range (TIR) remained within international targets but declined modestly from 75% at 1 year to 74% at 3 years (P = 0.002). The percentage of automatic correction boluses increased over time, whereas user-initiated boluses and carbohydrate entries declined (P < 0.001). Youth with higher TIR at 1 year showed a progressive reduction in TIR and greater increase in automated corrections (time × group interaction P < 0.001). At 3 years, higher SmartGuard use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.23; P = 0.007), optimal system settings (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.33–7.77; P = 0.010), and lower automatic correction boluses (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89; P < 0.001) were independently associated with achieving TITR ≥50%. Conclusions: MiniMed 780G provides sustained glycemic control over 3 years. However, progressive reliance on automated corrections and reduced user engagement may attenuate tight glycemic control, highlighting the need for ongoing education and proactive device optimization.
closed-loop insulin delivery; continuous glucose monitoring; education; pediatrics; pump settings
Settore MEDS-20/A - Pediatria generale e specialistica
2026
17-lug-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bombaci-et-al-2026-three-year-durability-of-automated-insulin-delivery-therapy-in-children-and-adolescents-with-type-1.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: online first
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 743.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
743.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1269897
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact