Objectives: The importance of sex as a determinant of Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) outcome in adults with dystonia remains uncertain. We investigated whether sex is a determinant of the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS in dystonia. Methods: In this double-center, retrospective cohort study, we followed patients with idiopathic, inherited, or secondary dystonia for at least 12 months after surgery. Dystonia was assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). Adverse events were recorded. Results: Fifty-six consecutive patients (22 M/34F) were studied. GPi-DBS led to comparable improvements in both sexes. Male patients showed a motor improvement of 62.6 ± 42.4% at 1 year and 53.9 ± 20.9% at the last follow-up (8.6 ± 3.3 years), while female patients showed a motor improvement of 60.5%±29.0% at 1 year and 48.6 ± 28.3% at the last follow-up (at 7.1 ± 4.2 years). Improvement in disability and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. At the first reglage, females showed lower electrical energy delivery, which increased significantly during follow-up. The position of the optimal stimulation center did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the overall motor outcomes and safety profiles were similar across sexes, indicating that factors such as age at implant, precision of lead positioning, and severity of dystonia may be more critical determinants of efficacy than sex itself.

Sex-related differences in the short and long-term outcome of internal pallidus stimulation for dystonia / L.M. Romito, R.T.. - In: NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 1590-1874. - 47:1(2026 Jan), pp. 168.168-168.168. [10.1007/s10072-025-08733-3]

Sex-related differences in the short and long-term outcome of internal pallidus stimulation for dystonia

R. Eleopra
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Objectives: The importance of sex as a determinant of Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) outcome in adults with dystonia remains uncertain. We investigated whether sex is a determinant of the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS in dystonia. Methods: In this double-center, retrospective cohort study, we followed patients with idiopathic, inherited, or secondary dystonia for at least 12 months after surgery. Dystonia was assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). Adverse events were recorded. Results: Fifty-six consecutive patients (22 M/34F) were studied. GPi-DBS led to comparable improvements in both sexes. Male patients showed a motor improvement of 62.6 ± 42.4% at 1 year and 53.9 ± 20.9% at the last follow-up (8.6 ± 3.3 years), while female patients showed a motor improvement of 60.5%±29.0% at 1 year and 48.6 ± 28.3% at the last follow-up (at 7.1 ± 4.2 years). Improvement in disability and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. At the first reglage, females showed lower electrical energy delivery, which increased significantly during follow-up. The position of the optimal stimulation center did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the overall motor outcomes and safety profiles were similar across sexes, indicating that factors such as age at implant, precision of lead positioning, and severity of dystonia may be more critical determinants of efficacy than sex itself.
Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale; DBS; Deep brain stimulation; Dystonia; Female; GPi; Globus pallidum internus; Male; Sex
Settore MEDS-12/A - Neurologia
gen-2026
17-gen-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-869314031.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1268375
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact