Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common adult-onset focal dystonia, with heterogeneous clinical presentation and significant functional impairment. Currently, no structured Italian good clinical practice documents specifically addressing CD have been published. Optimizing CD management requires expert-based recommendations to guide diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. A two-round Delphi process was conducted, involving a scientific board of six neurologists with expertise in CD management and an external panel of 56 Italian experts (neurologists and physiatrists managing CD patients). Fifty-two statements were developed, discussed, and voted using a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement (‘strongly agree’ or ‘somewhat agree’). In Round 1, 48 of 52 statements (92.4%) reached consensus; the four remaining statements were revised, and two were re-voted in Round 2, both achieving consensus. Final recommendations emphasize comprehensive patient assessment in multiple postural conditions; individualized botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) dosing taking into account tonic and phasic components, pain, and dysphagia; the use of instrumental guidance; standardized outcome measures; and integration of physiotherapy and psychological support. This article provides structured good clinical practice recommendations for CD management and offers clinicians, especially those with limited experience, a practical framework to standardize care, optimize treatment, and improve patient outcomes.

Good Clinical Practices for the Management of Cervical Dystonia with BoNT-A: A Delphi-Based Approach from the Italian Expert Group / R. Eleopra, M.E.. - In: TOXINS. - ISSN 2072-6651. - 18:2(2026 Feb), pp. 79.1-79.12. [10.3390/toxins18020079]

Good Clinical Practices for the Management of Cervical Dystonia with BoNT-A: A Delphi-Based Approach from the Italian Expert Group

R. Eleopra
Primo
;
2026

Abstract

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common adult-onset focal dystonia, with heterogeneous clinical presentation and significant functional impairment. Currently, no structured Italian good clinical practice documents specifically addressing CD have been published. Optimizing CD management requires expert-based recommendations to guide diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. A two-round Delphi process was conducted, involving a scientific board of six neurologists with expertise in CD management and an external panel of 56 Italian experts (neurologists and physiatrists managing CD patients). Fifty-two statements were developed, discussed, and voted using a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement (‘strongly agree’ or ‘somewhat agree’). In Round 1, 48 of 52 statements (92.4%) reached consensus; the four remaining statements were revised, and two were re-voted in Round 2, both achieving consensus. Final recommendations emphasize comprehensive patient assessment in multiple postural conditions; individualized botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) dosing taking into account tonic and phasic components, pain, and dysphagia; the use of instrumental guidance; standardized outcome measures; and integration of physiotherapy and psychological support. This article provides structured good clinical practice recommendations for CD management and offers clinicians, especially those with limited experience, a practical framework to standardize care, optimize treatment, and improve patient outcomes.
botulinum neurotoxin type A; cervical dystonia; clinical management; good clinical practice
Settore MEDS-12/A - Neurologia
feb-2026
2-feb-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
toxins-18-00079-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 354.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
354.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1268036
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact