There is a need of consensus about the pulmonary rehabilitation\r\n(PR) in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute\r\ncare. To facilitate the knowledge of the evidence and its translation\r\ninto practice, we developed suggestions based on experts’\r\nopinion. A steering committee identified areas and questions sent\r\nto experts. Other international experts participated to a RAND\r\nDelphi method in reaching consensus and proposing further suggestions.\r\nStrong agreement in suggestions was defined when the\r\nmean agreement was >7 (1 = no agreement and 9 = maximal\r\nagreement). Panelists response rate was >95%. Twenty-three\r\nquestions from 4 areas: personnel protection equipment, phenotypes,\r\nassessments, interventions, were identified and experts\r\nanswered with 121 suggestions, 119 of which received high level\r\nof concordance. The evidence-based suggestions provide the clinicians\r\nwith current evidence and clinical experts opinion. This\r\nframework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within\r\nthe context of the individual patient. Further studies will evaluate\r\nthe clinical usefulness of these suggestions.

Italian suggestions for pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure: results of a Delphi process / M. Vitacca, M.L.. - In: MONALDI ARCHIVES FOR CHEST DISEASE. - ISSN 2532-5264. - 90:2(2020), pp. 385-393. [10.4081/monaldi.2020.1444]

Italian suggestions for pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure: results of a Delphi process

V. Rossi;M. Santambrogio;M. Mantero;G. Castellini;
2020

Abstract

There is a need of consensus about the pulmonary rehabilitation\r\n(PR) in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute\r\ncare. To facilitate the knowledge of the evidence and its translation\r\ninto practice, we developed suggestions based on experts’\r\nopinion. A steering committee identified areas and questions sent\r\nto experts. Other international experts participated to a RAND\r\nDelphi method in reaching consensus and proposing further suggestions.\r\nStrong agreement in suggestions was defined when the\r\nmean agreement was >7 (1 = no agreement and 9 = maximal\r\nagreement). Panelists response rate was >95%. Twenty-three\r\nquestions from 4 areas: personnel protection equipment, phenotypes,\r\nassessments, interventions, were identified and experts\r\nanswered with 121 suggestions, 119 of which received high level\r\nof concordance. The evidence-based suggestions provide the clinicians\r\nwith current evidence and clinical experts opinion. This\r\nframework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within\r\nthe context of the individual patient. Further studies will evaluate\r\nthe clinical usefulness of these suggestions.
COVID 19; Dephi process; Respiratory failure; Respiratory infection; Rehabilitation;
Settore MEDS-07/A - Malattie dell'apparato respiratorio
Settore MEDS-26/C - Scienze delle professioni sanitarie della riabilitazione
2020
https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/1444
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nmoscato,+MONALDI_2020_2_1444_opt.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 521.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
521.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1266457
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 70
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
  • OpenAlex 87
social impact