Pilot and research-scale process facilities pose safety challenges distinct from industrial plants, due to dynamic configurations, novelty and data uncertainty, and a strong reliance on non-routine operations and human intervention; consequently, traditional process safety methods, while essential, are not always ideal for rapid screening and comparison in academic R&D settings. This work proposes a structured safety index for pilot and research-scale operations, integrating four complementary dimensions: process and substance hazards, design and mechanical integrity, operations and human factors, and technical barriers and emergency readiness. The index adopts a discrete scoring system and is intended for comparative prioritization rather than predictive risk quantification. The methodology is demonstrated on a pilot-scale Fischer–Tropsch unit, showing that configuration-dependent and operational factors dominate the risk profile, while intrinsic hazards are partially offset by limited inventories and data maturity. The approach supports transparent safety management and helps target follow-up analyses. Future work will focus on broader validation across different pilot facilities and experimental campaigns, as well as on integrating the index with quantitative risk assessment to evaluate release consequences and potential escalation scenarios.

Developing a Risk Index for Pilot and Research-scale Process Operations / P. Mocellin, N.B.. - In: CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS. - ISSN 2283-9216. - 126:(2026 Jul 15), pp. 85-90. (12. CISAP12 - FEx CConference on Safety & Environment in Process & Power Industry and Fire Explosion : June, 14th - 17th Torino 2026) [10.3303/CET26126015].

Developing a Risk Index for Pilot and Research-scale Process Operations

N. Bernareggi
Secondo
;
C. Pirola
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Pilot and research-scale process facilities pose safety challenges distinct from industrial plants, due to dynamic configurations, novelty and data uncertainty, and a strong reliance on non-routine operations and human intervention; consequently, traditional process safety methods, while essential, are not always ideal for rapid screening and comparison in academic R&D settings. This work proposes a structured safety index for pilot and research-scale operations, integrating four complementary dimensions: process and substance hazards, design and mechanical integrity, operations and human factors, and technical barriers and emergency readiness. The index adopts a discrete scoring system and is intended for comparative prioritization rather than predictive risk quantification. The methodology is demonstrated on a pilot-scale Fischer–Tropsch unit, showing that configuration-dependent and operational factors dominate the risk profile, while intrinsic hazards are partially offset by limited inventories and data maturity. The approach supports transparent safety management and helps target follow-up analyses. Future work will focus on broader validation across different pilot facilities and experimental campaigns, as well as on integrating the index with quantitative risk assessment to evaluate release consequences and potential escalation scenarios.
Settore ICHI-02/A - Impianti chimici
15-lug-2026
Associazione Italiana Di Ingegneria Chimica (AIDIC)
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
[181] CET 126 (2026).pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 884.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
884.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1265515
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact