This article argues against the idea that there is a continuity in the way in which Kant and Hegel conceive the normativity of conceptuality – normally seen as the authentic nucleus of both their philosophies, as opposed to pre-Kantian me- taphysics. It therefore contests the practice of interpreting Hegel’s relation to Kant in an epistemological sense. Despite being present in Hegel’s account, the epistemo- logically normative role of conceptuality is just a corollary to its ontological under- standing. Finally, it affirms that, in this respect, Hegel’s position is to be seen more as a radicalization of Wolff ’s stance than as an alternative to it.
Un wolffiano dopo Kant? Aspetti wolffiani nella concezione hegeliana del rapporto tra logica e metafisica / L. Sala. - In: GIORNALE DI METAFISICA. - ISSN 0017-0372. - 43:1(2021), pp. 176-190.
Un wolffiano dopo Kant? Aspetti wolffiani nella concezione hegeliana del rapporto tra logica e metafisica
L. Sala
2021
Abstract
This article argues against the idea that there is a continuity in the way in which Kant and Hegel conceive the normativity of conceptuality – normally seen as the authentic nucleus of both their philosophies, as opposed to pre-Kantian me- taphysics. It therefore contests the practice of interpreting Hegel’s relation to Kant in an epistemological sense. Despite being present in Hegel’s account, the epistemo- logically normative role of conceptuality is just a corollary to its ontological under- standing. Finally, it affirms that, in this respect, Hegel’s position is to be seen more as a radicalization of Wolff ’s stance than as an alternative to it.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sala giornale di Metafisica.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
304.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
304.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




