BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a well-recognized late complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS), but there is no consensus on the optimal endovascular treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting drug-coated balloon (DEB) and cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty for the treatment of significant carotid ISR. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated for significant (>70%) ISR after CAS at a single tertiary center between January 2022 and June 2023 with either a paclitaxel-coated DEB (ELUTAX™) or a CB (WOLVERINE™) were retrospectively analyzed. Allocation between the two devices was performed at the operator’s discretion in a non-randomized fashion. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of any neurological event, death, and recurrent restenosis >50% at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from recurrent >70% restenosis at 12 months on duplex ultrasound surveillance. Categorical variables were compared with the Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test, continuous variables with Student’s t-test. Freedom from restenosis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (18 DEB, 12 CB). Baseline demographic and anatomical features were comparable between groups, with the exception of a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the DEB group (38.9% vs. 0%, P=0.02). Procedural technical success was achieved in all 30 cases. At 30 days, no neurological events, deaths or recurrent restenoses >50% were observed in either group. After a mean follow-up of 14.1±8.1 months, freedom from >70% restenosis at 12 months was 100% in the DEB group and 41.7±14.2% in the CB group (log-rank P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this small single-center retrospective experience, both DEB and CB angioplasty proved feasible and safe for the endovascular treatment of carotid ISR after CAS. DEB angioplasty was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent restenosis at 12-month follow-up. These hypothesis-generating findings should be confirmed in larger, ideally prospective and randomized studies before any definitive recommendation can be made.

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty or cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of restenosis after carotid artery stenting / J. Marchello, D.M.. - In: ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1824-4777. - 33:2(2026 Jun), pp. 32-38. [10.23736/S1824-4777.26.01730-4]

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty or cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of restenosis after carotid artery stenting.

J. Marchello
Primo
;
D. Mazzaccaro
Secondo
;
G. Bonalumi;G. Nano
Penultimo
;
2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a well-recognized late complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS), but there is no consensus on the optimal endovascular treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting drug-coated balloon (DEB) and cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty for the treatment of significant carotid ISR. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated for significant (>70%) ISR after CAS at a single tertiary center between January 2022 and June 2023 with either a paclitaxel-coated DEB (ELUTAX™) or a CB (WOLVERINE™) were retrospectively analyzed. Allocation between the two devices was performed at the operator’s discretion in a non-randomized fashion. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of any neurological event, death, and recurrent restenosis >50% at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from recurrent >70% restenosis at 12 months on duplex ultrasound surveillance. Categorical variables were compared with the Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test, continuous variables with Student’s t-test. Freedom from restenosis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (18 DEB, 12 CB). Baseline demographic and anatomical features were comparable between groups, with the exception of a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the DEB group (38.9% vs. 0%, P=0.02). Procedural technical success was achieved in all 30 cases. At 30 days, no neurological events, deaths or recurrent restenoses >50% were observed in either group. After a mean follow-up of 14.1±8.1 months, freedom from >70% restenosis at 12 months was 100% in the DEB group and 41.7±14.2% in the CB group (log-rank P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this small single-center retrospective experience, both DEB and CB angioplasty proved feasible and safe for the endovascular treatment of carotid ISR after CAS. DEB angioplasty was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent restenosis at 12-month follow-up. These hypothesis-generating findings should be confirmed in larger, ideally prospective and randomized studies before any definitive recommendation can be made.
Carotid arteries; stents; Balloon angioplasty; Atherectomy; Paclitaxel; Endovascular procedures;
Settore MEDS-13/B - Chirurgia vascolare
giu-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty or cutting balloon angioplasty for restenosis after CAS.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 506.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
506.13 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1259995
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact