Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is causal in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), still the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. The 2025 update of the ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia recommends increasingly stringent, risk-based LDL-C targets. Beyond achieved LDL-C targets, cumulative exposure over time has emerged as a key determinant of ASCVD risk. Accordingly, treatment strategies should evolve from a traditional stepwise approach toward a more proactive, personalized, and target-oriented model; the recognized impact of cumulative LDL-C exposure further reinforces the importance of early, intensive, and sustained lipid lowering therapies (LLT). Despite this awareness and the availability of effective therapies, LDL-C control in clinical practice remains suboptimal. This gap is largely driven by the so called “therapeutic inertia”, involving physician-related factors, patient barriers, and healthcare system constraints; accordingly, fewer than one-third of patients in secondary prevention achieve recommended LDL-C goals. A significant improvement in this situation requires structured treatment algorithms, multidisciplinary care, improved patient education, and integration of digital decision-support tools. A pragmatic framework to improve goal attainment is the estimation of “distance to target” , which enables selection of LLT based on the required percentage reduction from baseline LDL-C levels. This approach facilitates alignment between the expected efficacy of available treatments and individual patient needs. While statins remain first-line therapy, combination regimens are frequently required—particularly in very high-risk patients—including ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors, and inclisiran.
LDL-cholesterol distance to target: A practical tool for guiding lipid-lowering treatment decisions / M.C. Palloni, T.F.. - In: ATHEROSCLEROSIS PLUS. - ISSN 2667-0895. - 65:(2026 Sep), pp. 100574.1-100574.9. [10.1016/j.athplu.2026.100574]
LDL-cholesterol distance to target: A practical tool for guiding lipid-lowering treatment decisions
M.C. PalloniCo-primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;T. FarellaCo-primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;M. Ruscica
Writing – Review & Editing
;A. CorsiniWriting – Review & Editing
;S. Carugo;
2026
Abstract
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is causal in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), still the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. The 2025 update of the ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia recommends increasingly stringent, risk-based LDL-C targets. Beyond achieved LDL-C targets, cumulative exposure over time has emerged as a key determinant of ASCVD risk. Accordingly, treatment strategies should evolve from a traditional stepwise approach toward a more proactive, personalized, and target-oriented model; the recognized impact of cumulative LDL-C exposure further reinforces the importance of early, intensive, and sustained lipid lowering therapies (LLT). Despite this awareness and the availability of effective therapies, LDL-C control in clinical practice remains suboptimal. This gap is largely driven by the so called “therapeutic inertia”, involving physician-related factors, patient barriers, and healthcare system constraints; accordingly, fewer than one-third of patients in secondary prevention achieve recommended LDL-C goals. A significant improvement in this situation requires structured treatment algorithms, multidisciplinary care, improved patient education, and integration of digital decision-support tools. A pragmatic framework to improve goal attainment is the estimation of “distance to target” , which enables selection of LLT based on the required percentage reduction from baseline LDL-C levels. This approach facilitates alignment between the expected efficacy of available treatments and individual patient needs. While statins remain first-line therapy, combination regimens are frequently required—particularly in very high-risk patients—including ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors, and inclisiran.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maria Chiara Palloni.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
6.03 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.03 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




