This article examines how religiosity and attitudes toward gender and LGBTQI+ rights intersect in shaping support for populist radical right (PRR) parties in Europe. Using four waves of the European Social Survey (2016-2024), we compare Italy, Hungary, and the Netherlands, three countries that exemplify divergent trajectories of secularization and gender politics. By adopting an individual-level perspective, we find that religiosity does not structure PRR support in Italy, plays a limited but visible "vaccine" role in the Netherlands, and becomes a positive "fundamentalist" driver of support in Hungary, where religion is strongly politicized. It also finds that conservative attitudes toward gender and LGBTQI+ rights are less influential than expected. The comparative lens reveals that religiosity produces distinct electoral effects across countries, underscoring the need to integrate context-sensitive approaches in the study of PRRs.
Linking religiosity, LGBTQI+ attitudes, and Populist Radical Right: How context matters—Evidence from Italy, Hungary, and the Netherlands / M. Rolandi, G.D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY. - ISSN 0020-7152. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/00207152261454640]
Linking religiosity, LGBTQI+ attitudes, and Populist Radical Right: How context matters—Evidence from Italy, Hungary, and the Netherlands
M. Rolandi
Primo
;G. DolciSecondo
;S. GuglielmiUltimo
2026
Abstract
This article examines how religiosity and attitudes toward gender and LGBTQI+ rights intersect in shaping support for populist radical right (PRR) parties in Europe. Using four waves of the European Social Survey (2016-2024), we compare Italy, Hungary, and the Netherlands, three countries that exemplify divergent trajectories of secularization and gender politics. By adopting an individual-level perspective, we find that religiosity does not structure PRR support in Italy, plays a limited but visible "vaccine" role in the Netherlands, and becomes a positive "fundamentalist" driver of support in Hungary, where religion is strongly politicized. It also finds that conservative attitudes toward gender and LGBTQI+ rights are less influential than expected. The comparative lens reveals that religiosity produces distinct electoral effects across countries, underscoring the need to integrate context-sensitive approaches in the study of PRRs.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
IJCS AAM Revised Paper_v04.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
727.33 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
727.33 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




