In 2023, Rotterdam discontinued an invasive, biased welfare fraud risk-scoring algorithm after an investigative report by Lighthouse Reports, which exposed its racial and gender biases, disproportionately af fecting migrant mothers in deprived areas. This chapter argues that such biases could have been identif ied before implementation by scrutinizing the categories embedded in the algorithm and contextualizing them within the history of the Dutch welfare system. Using a genealogical approach, we trace how norms about race and gender became embedded in welfare practices. A category analysis shows how these biases shaped the algorithm’s indicators. Drawing on critical data studies and feminist theories on migrant motherhood and racialized citizenship, we show how discriminatory ideas about the “ideal” welfare recipient predate the algorithm, contributing to discussions about equality in dataf ied welfare governance.
Motherhood in the Datafied Welfare State: Investigating the Gendered and Racialized Enactment of Citizenship in Dutch Algorithmic Governance / G. Van Schie, L.C. - In: Governing the Digital Society : Platforms, Artificial Intelligence, and Public Values / [a cura di] J. van Dijck, K. van Es, A. Helmond, F. van der Vlist. - [s.l] : Amsterdam University Press, 2025. - ISBN 9789048562725. - pp. 209-225 [10.5117/9789048562718-12]
Motherhood in the Datafied Welfare State: Investigating the Gendered and Racialized Enactment of Citizenship in Dutch Algorithmic Governance
D. HuyskesUltimo
2025
Abstract
In 2023, Rotterdam discontinued an invasive, biased welfare fraud risk-scoring algorithm after an investigative report by Lighthouse Reports, which exposed its racial and gender biases, disproportionately af fecting migrant mothers in deprived areas. This chapter argues that such biases could have been identif ied before implementation by scrutinizing the categories embedded in the algorithm and contextualizing them within the history of the Dutch welfare system. Using a genealogical approach, we trace how norms about race and gender became embedded in welfare practices. A category analysis shows how these biases shaped the algorithm’s indicators. Drawing on critical data studies and feminist theories on migrant motherhood and racialized citizenship, we show how discriminatory ideas about the “ideal” welfare recipient predate the algorithm, contributing to discussions about equality in dataf ied welfare governance.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
10.5117_9789048562718-12_chapterpdf.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
399.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
399.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




