In 2023, Rotterdam discontinued an invasive, biased welfare fraud risk-scoring algorithm after an investigative report by Lighthouse Reports, which exposed its racial and gender biases, disproportionately af fecting migrant mothers in deprived areas. This chapter argues that such biases could have been identif ied before implementation by scrutinizing the categories embedded in the algorithm and contextualizing them within the history of the Dutch welfare system. Using a genealogical approach, we trace how norms about race and gender became embedded in welfare practices. A category analysis shows how these biases shaped the algorithm’s indicators. Drawing on critical data studies and feminist theories on migrant motherhood and racialized citizenship, we show how discriminatory ideas about the “ideal” welfare recipient predate the algorithm, contributing to discussions about equality in dataf ied welfare governance.

Motherhood in the Datafied Welfare State: Investigating the Gendered and Racialized Enactment of Citizenship in Dutch Algorithmic Governance / G. Van Schie, L.C. - In: Governing the Digital Society : Platforms, Artificial Intelligence, and Public Values / [a cura di] J. van Dijck, K. van Es, A. Helmond, F. van der Vlist. - [s.l] : Amsterdam University Press, 2025. - ISBN 9789048562725. - pp. 209-225 [10.5117/9789048562718-12]

Motherhood in the Datafied Welfare State: Investigating the Gendered and Racialized Enactment of Citizenship in Dutch Algorithmic Governance

D. Huyskes
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

In 2023, Rotterdam discontinued an invasive, biased welfare fraud risk-scoring algorithm after an investigative report by Lighthouse Reports, which exposed its racial and gender biases, disproportionately af fecting migrant mothers in deprived areas. This chapter argues that such biases could have been identif ied before implementation by scrutinizing the categories embedded in the algorithm and contextualizing them within the history of the Dutch welfare system. Using a genealogical approach, we trace how norms about race and gender became embedded in welfare practices. A category analysis shows how these biases shaped the algorithm’s indicators. Drawing on critical data studies and feminist theories on migrant motherhood and racialized citizenship, we show how discriminatory ideas about the “ideal” welfare recipient predate the algorithm, contributing to discussions about equality in dataf ied welfare governance.
Settore GSPS-06/A - Sociologia dei processi culturali e comunicativi
2025
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.5117_9789048562718-12_chapterpdf.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 399.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
399.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1256543
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact