This discussion deals with Mario Perniola’s postume autobiography Tiresia contro Edipo. By setting the discourse on Nietzsche’s analogy about life’s narration as landscape drawing, the discussion focuses, firstly, on what Derrida calls the “trait” of drawing, as an experience of the difference. “Experience” means here – with Heideggerian echoes – let us open to the coming of the heterogeneous, the different. That is what tumor’s diagnosis has meant to Perniola. “Madame Death” – he writes – has opened to him something that he calls a “becoming”. But it is Perniola’s life itself that might be seen as an endless becoming, each time different. We try to show that one might look at this autobiography as a way to articulate this becoming or life. In doing so, we refer to Deleuze and what he writes on the link between “writing”, “becoming”, and “life”. Writing, in Deleuzean pages, is seen as way of thinking up new life’s possibilities. Alongside all of these topics, we show that Perniola’s gesture by which he writes his autobiography is deeply coherent with his philosophical production; “difference”, “becoming”, “writing”: these are, in fact, issues that has always got Perniola’s thought involved with.

Del disegnare una vita : Note sull'autobiografia di Mario Perniola / M.M. Paolucci. - In: LA CULTURA. - ISSN 0393-1560. - 61:1(2023 Apr), pp. 137-154. [10.1403/107009]

Del disegnare una vita : Note sull'autobiografia di Mario Perniola

M.M. Paolucci
2023

Abstract

This discussion deals with Mario Perniola’s postume autobiography Tiresia contro Edipo. By setting the discourse on Nietzsche’s analogy about life’s narration as landscape drawing, the discussion focuses, firstly, on what Derrida calls the “trait” of drawing, as an experience of the difference. “Experience” means here – with Heideggerian echoes – let us open to the coming of the heterogeneous, the different. That is what tumor’s diagnosis has meant to Perniola. “Madame Death” – he writes – has opened to him something that he calls a “becoming”. But it is Perniola’s life itself that might be seen as an endless becoming, each time different. We try to show that one might look at this autobiography as a way to articulate this becoming or life. In doing so, we refer to Deleuze and what he writes on the link between “writing”, “becoming”, and “life”. Writing, in Deleuzean pages, is seen as way of thinking up new life’s possibilities. Alongside all of these topics, we show that Perniola’s gesture by which he writes his autobiography is deeply coherent with his philosophical production; “difference”, “becoming”, “writing”: these are, in fact, issues that has always got Perniola’s thought involved with.
Perniola; Autobiography; Derrida; Becoming; Deleuze
Settore PHIL-01/A - Filosofia teoretica
apr-2023
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1403/107009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
11_paolucci.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 179.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
179.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1255156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact