Biostimulants and nitrification inhibitors are promising tools to improve nitrogen dynamics in agricultural soils and reduce associated environmental impacts. In Europe, these solutions are increasingly promoted to improve nitrogen use efficiency and losses, yet farm-level evidence of their combined environmental performance in maize remains limited. This study evaluated whether applying a microbial biostimulant (Methylobacterium symbioticum SB23) with a nitrapyrin-based nitrification inhibitor can mitigate the environmental impacts of maize in Italy. A cradle-to-farm-gate LCA was performed on 14 farms, comparing a conventional scenario (CS) with an alternative scenario (AS) applying the two products while reducing mineral N fertilization. Three functional units were assessed: 1 tonne maize grain (14% moisture), 1 tonne high-moisture corn (25% DM), and 1 tonne fresh chopped maize (35% DM). Inventory modelling combined primary on-farm data from questionnaires and interviews with secondary data, including Brentrup's N balance for N emissions. Across farms and functional units, AS generally lowered nitrogen-driven categories, climate change, acidification, particulate matter formation, and terrestrial eutrophication, reflecting reduced mineral N inputs and inhibited nitrification. For grain, 10 of 11 impact categories decreased (−2% to −50%); for high-moisture corn, 8 of 11 decreased (−1% to −87%); and for silage, 10 of 11 decreased (−1% to −83%). Trade-offs emerged: marine eutrophication occasionally increased where fertilizer reductions were limited and the biostimulant enhanced soil N availability, increasing NO3- leaching. Contribution analysis confirmed category hotspots: NH3 volatilization for acidification, particulate matter, and terrestrial eutrophication, N2O for climate change, NO3− leaching for marine eutrophication, and crop protection products for freshwater ecotoxicity. Overall, integrating a microbial biostimulant with a nitrification inhibitor can substantially reduce most impacts of maize cultivation.

Sustainable nitrogen management in maize: environmental benefits of integrating microbial biostimulants and nitrification inhibitors / F. Vigo, M.Z.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION. - ISSN 0959-6526. - 569:(2026 Jun 20), pp. 148606.1-148606.11. [10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148606]

Sustainable nitrogen management in maize: environmental benefits of integrating microbial biostimulants and nitrification inhibitors

F. Vigo
Primo
;
M. Zoli
Secondo
;
J. Bacenetti
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Biostimulants and nitrification inhibitors are promising tools to improve nitrogen dynamics in agricultural soils and reduce associated environmental impacts. In Europe, these solutions are increasingly promoted to improve nitrogen use efficiency and losses, yet farm-level evidence of their combined environmental performance in maize remains limited. This study evaluated whether applying a microbial biostimulant (Methylobacterium symbioticum SB23) with a nitrapyrin-based nitrification inhibitor can mitigate the environmental impacts of maize in Italy. A cradle-to-farm-gate LCA was performed on 14 farms, comparing a conventional scenario (CS) with an alternative scenario (AS) applying the two products while reducing mineral N fertilization. Three functional units were assessed: 1 tonne maize grain (14% moisture), 1 tonne high-moisture corn (25% DM), and 1 tonne fresh chopped maize (35% DM). Inventory modelling combined primary on-farm data from questionnaires and interviews with secondary data, including Brentrup's N balance for N emissions. Across farms and functional units, AS generally lowered nitrogen-driven categories, climate change, acidification, particulate matter formation, and terrestrial eutrophication, reflecting reduced mineral N inputs and inhibited nitrification. For grain, 10 of 11 impact categories decreased (−2% to −50%); for high-moisture corn, 8 of 11 decreased (−1% to −87%); and for silage, 10 of 11 decreased (−1% to −83%). Trade-offs emerged: marine eutrophication occasionally increased where fertilizer reductions were limited and the biostimulant enhanced soil N availability, increasing NO3- leaching. Contribution analysis confirmed category hotspots: NH3 volatilization for acidification, particulate matter, and terrestrial eutrophication, N2O for climate change, NO3− leaching for marine eutrophication, and crop protection products for freshwater ecotoxicity. Overall, integrating a microbial biostimulant with a nitrification inhibitor can substantially reduce most impacts of maize cultivation.
life cycle assessment; nitrogen emissions; environmental benefit; sustainable fertilization
Settore AGRI-04/B - Meccanica agraria
20-giu-2026
10-giu-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VIGO ET AL.,2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.53 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1253976
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact