Introduction: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer in combination with hormonal therapy. Recent data from large trials comprising these agents in different settings show that a proportion of patients do not actually achieve a clinical benefit from this class, without a clear-cut panorama of predictive biomarkers. Here, clinical and preclinical evidence regarding plausible alterations that have been studied as possible candidates for better steering the indications of CDK4/6i in clinical practice are reviewed and analyzed. Areas covered: We explored cyclin D-related aberrations, ESR1 mutational profile, pRb levels/loss of RB1 function, cyclin E1-E2 overexpression, CDK6 amplification, PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway interactions, and CDKN2A loss/CDK2 activity. Expert opinion: The complex molecular pathway involving cell cycle regulation still hampers the validation of a single marker to rationally select patients who would benefit the most from CDK4/6i and avoid futile toxicity. We perceive that, through a combination of assembled molecular alterations, both patient and resource allocation can be optimized. In the meanwhile, paired and reproducible tumor analyses, as well as early ctDNA dynamics, are strongly supported through clinical trials.

An analysis of available biomarker data for targeting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) in breast cancer / B.A. Duso, E.F.. - In: EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 2380-8993. - 4:3(2019 May 04), pp. 129-138. [10.1080/23808993.2019.1604136]

An analysis of available biomarker data for targeting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) in breast cancer

E. Ferraro
Secondo
;
L. Mazzarella;G. Curigliano
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer in combination with hormonal therapy. Recent data from large trials comprising these agents in different settings show that a proportion of patients do not actually achieve a clinical benefit from this class, without a clear-cut panorama of predictive biomarkers. Here, clinical and preclinical evidence regarding plausible alterations that have been studied as possible candidates for better steering the indications of CDK4/6i in clinical practice are reviewed and analyzed. Areas covered: We explored cyclin D-related aberrations, ESR1 mutational profile, pRb levels/loss of RB1 function, cyclin E1-E2 overexpression, CDK6 amplification, PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway interactions, and CDKN2A loss/CDK2 activity. Expert opinion: The complex molecular pathway involving cell cycle regulation still hampers the validation of a single marker to rationally select patients who would benefit the most from CDK4/6i and avoid futile toxicity. We perceive that, through a combination of assembled molecular alterations, both patient and resource allocation can be optimized. In the meanwhile, paired and reproducible tumor analyses, as well as early ctDNA dynamics, are strongly supported through clinical trials.
biomarker; breast cancer; CDK; CDK4/6; cyclin dependent kinase; precision medicine; resistance;
Settore MEDS-09/A - Oncologia medica
4-mag-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
An_analysis_of_available_biomarker_data_for_target.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 895.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
895.46 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1252982
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact