This article analyses a controversial passage from the Errores philosophorum, tra-ditionally attributed to Giles of Rome, located within the first error ascribed to Averroes (Errores, IV, 1). The passage addresses the question of creatio ex nihilo and uses enigmatic terminology, referring to the loquentes – a Latin term that identifies the mutakallimūn of the Arab world – as voluntates. Through a systematic comparison between the Latin and Hebrew manuscript traditions of Averroes’ Commentarium magnum in Physicorum libros, the hypothe-sis of a palaeographical corruption of the term voluntates from involventes, the meaning of the term within the given context, and possible alternative readings are investigated. The study aims to show that the term voluntates ultimately represents an authentic element of the text of the Errores philosophorum. In conclusion, a comprehensive re-evaluation of the passage in the broader context of the work is proposed, outlining its theoretical implications and its re-lationship with contemporary sources.

Loquentes in lege sua appellat voluntates. Alcune osservazioni su un passo controverso degli Errores philosophorum attribuiti a Egidio Romano / M. Buccilli. - In: NOCTUA. - ISSN 2284-1180. - XIII:1(2026 May 31), pp. 3.82-3.104. [10.14640/NoctuaXIII3]

Loquentes in lege sua appellat voluntates. Alcune osservazioni su un passo controverso degli Errores philosophorum attribuiti a Egidio Romano

M. Buccilli
Primo
2026

Abstract

This article analyses a controversial passage from the Errores philosophorum, tra-ditionally attributed to Giles of Rome, located within the first error ascribed to Averroes (Errores, IV, 1). The passage addresses the question of creatio ex nihilo and uses enigmatic terminology, referring to the loquentes – a Latin term that identifies the mutakallimūn of the Arab world – as voluntates. Through a systematic comparison between the Latin and Hebrew manuscript traditions of Averroes’ Commentarium magnum in Physicorum libros, the hypothe-sis of a palaeographical corruption of the term voluntates from involventes, the meaning of the term within the given context, and possible alternative readings are investigated. The study aims to show that the term voluntates ultimately represents an authentic element of the text of the Errores philosophorum. In conclusion, a comprehensive re-evaluation of the passage in the broader context of the work is proposed, outlining its theoretical implications and its re-lationship with contemporary sources.
Giles of Rome; Averroes; Errores philosophorum; mutakallimūn; involventes
Settore PHIL-05/A - Storia della filosofia
   Believing without Evidence? The Ethics of Belief and Doxastic Control from Augustine to Fake News [BELIEVIDENCE]
   BELIEVIDENCE
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   2022KSEMSR_002
31-mag-2026
https://doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaXIII3
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martina+Buccilli+|+Loquentes+in+lege+sua+appellat+voluntates.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 408.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
408.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1251635
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact