Although the incidence of endometrial carcinoma (EC) is similar in Black and White women, racial disparities are stark, with the highest mortality rates observed among Black patients. Here, analysis of 1,882 prospectively sequenced ECs using a clinical FDA-authorized tumor–normal panel revealed a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk histologic and molecular EC subtypes in self-identified Black (n = 259) compared with White (n = 1,623) patients. Clinically actionable alterations, including high tumor mutational burden/microsatellite instability, which confer benefit from immunotherapy, were less frequent in ECs from Black than from White patients. Ultramu-tated POLE molecular subtype ECs associated with favorable outcomes were rare in Black patients. Results were confirmed by genetic ancestry analysis. CCNE1 gene amplification, which is associated with aggressive clinical behavior, was more prevalent in carcinosarcomas occurring in Black than in White patients. ECs from Black and White patients display important differences in their histologic types, molecular subtypes, driver genetic alterations, and therapeutic targets. SIGNIFICANCE: Our comprehensive analysis of prospectively clinically sequenced ECs revealed signifi-cant differences in their histologic and molecular composition and in the presence of therapeutic targets in Black versus White patients. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating diverse populations into molecular studies and clinical trials to address EC disparities.

Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Carcinomas in Black and White Patients Reveals Disparate Drivers with Therapeutic Implications / B. Weigelt, A.M.. - In: CANCER DISCOVERY. - ISSN 2159-8274. - 13:11(2023 Nov), pp. 2356-2369. [10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0546]

Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Carcinomas in Black and White Patients Reveals Disparate Drivers with Therapeutic Implications

A. Marra
Co-primo
;
2023

Abstract

Although the incidence of endometrial carcinoma (EC) is similar in Black and White women, racial disparities are stark, with the highest mortality rates observed among Black patients. Here, analysis of 1,882 prospectively sequenced ECs using a clinical FDA-authorized tumor–normal panel revealed a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk histologic and molecular EC subtypes in self-identified Black (n = 259) compared with White (n = 1,623) patients. Clinically actionable alterations, including high tumor mutational burden/microsatellite instability, which confer benefit from immunotherapy, were less frequent in ECs from Black than from White patients. Ultramu-tated POLE molecular subtype ECs associated with favorable outcomes were rare in Black patients. Results were confirmed by genetic ancestry analysis. CCNE1 gene amplification, which is associated with aggressive clinical behavior, was more prevalent in carcinosarcomas occurring in Black than in White patients. ECs from Black and White patients display important differences in their histologic types, molecular subtypes, driver genetic alterations, and therapeutic targets. SIGNIFICANCE: Our comprehensive analysis of prospectively clinically sequenced ECs revealed signifi-cant differences in their histologic and molecular composition and in the presence of therapeutic targets in Black versus White patients. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating diverse populations into molecular studies and clinical trials to address EC disparities.
Settore MEDS-09/A - Oncologia medica
nov-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2356.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 7.97 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.97 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1249580
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 47
social impact