This study employs Social Network Analysis (SNA) to examine the structure and functioning of the peer-to-peer credit market in the first half of nineteenth-century Milan. By reconstructing over 2,200 notarised loan transactions involving more than 1,600 unique actors in the years 1825 and 1840, we demonstrate how notaries acted as key intermediaries, reducing reputational risk, facilitating trust-based lending beyond kinship and local ties, and enabling the formation of reliable credit relationships. Despite the market’s sparse topology, the rise in dual-role participants (both lenders and borrowers) and the modest expansion of connected components point to the spread of financial practice. Crucially, the regression results confirm that notaries played a central role in establishing a separating equilibrium, whereby borrower risk was credibly signalled and priced. This mechanism prevented credit rationing and ensured a relatively efficient allocation of capital. As such, the Milanese peer-to-peer credit market proved particularly conducive to economic modernisation, by supporting entrepreneurial initiatives from actors with limited landed collateral but strong reputational standing. The findings reveal a robust and functional non-institutional financial system that underpinned the expansion of productive capital and the emergence of a more dynamic bourgeois economy.

Weaving Trust: Notaries and Credit Market Networks in Nineteenth-Century Milan / G. De Luca, G.R. (PALGRAVE STUDIES IN ECONOMIC HISTORY). - In: Network Analysis for Economic, Business and Financial History : Methodological Advances and Applications / [a cura di] M.C. Schisani, G. De Luca, G. Ragozini, P. Cimadomo. - Prima edizione. - Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2026. - ISBN 9783032213549. - pp. 355-383 [10.1007/978-3-032-21355-6_12]

Weaving Trust: Notaries and Credit Market Networks in Nineteenth-Century Milan

G. De Luca
;
2026

Abstract

This study employs Social Network Analysis (SNA) to examine the structure and functioning of the peer-to-peer credit market in the first half of nineteenth-century Milan. By reconstructing over 2,200 notarised loan transactions involving more than 1,600 unique actors in the years 1825 and 1840, we demonstrate how notaries acted as key intermediaries, reducing reputational risk, facilitating trust-based lending beyond kinship and local ties, and enabling the formation of reliable credit relationships. Despite the market’s sparse topology, the rise in dual-role participants (both lenders and borrowers) and the modest expansion of connected components point to the spread of financial practice. Crucially, the regression results confirm that notaries played a central role in establishing a separating equilibrium, whereby borrower risk was credibly signalled and priced. This mechanism prevented credit rationing and ensured a relatively efficient allocation of capital. As such, the Milanese peer-to-peer credit market proved particularly conducive to economic modernisation, by supporting entrepreneurial initiatives from actors with limited landed collateral but strong reputational standing. The findings reveal a robust and functional non-institutional financial system that underpinned the expansion of productive capital and the emergence of a more dynamic bourgeois economy.
Notarised Loans; Social Network Analysis; Peer-to-Peer Lending; Separating Equilibrium; Milan; 19th century
Settore STEC-01/B - Storia economica
2026
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GDL_GR.corretto.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 606.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
606.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1249235
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact