Perceived severity and parental distress after positive expanded newborn screening: parent-clinician concordance and dyadic processes

Receiving a positive expanded newborn screening result is highly stressful for parents. This study aimed to examine parent–clinician concordance in perceived severity, to investigate its association with parental emotional distress at baseline and six months after communication, and to explore the interdependence between perceived severity and perceived control within parental dyads. A total of. 171 mothers and 168 fathers reported parental distress and completed the Impact of Event Scale–Revised and the Emotion Thermometers. Perceived severity and control were measured using single-item Likert scales reflecting subjective appraisals at the time of disclosure. For 147 parents (74 mothers and 73 fathers), a clinician-rated severity score was available. An Actor–Partner Interdependence Model with indistinguishable dyads was applied to 115 parental couples. Most parents (61.9%) rated their child’s condition as more severe than the clinician. At baseline, higher parental severity ratings relative to clinicians were associated with higher distress and post-traumatic symptoms. No differences were observed at 6 months. Higher perceived severity in one parent was associated with lower perceived control in the partner (β = − 0.207, p =.004). Conclusion: Differences between parental and clinician perceptions of severity are common following positive ENBS communication and are associated with elevated early parental distress. Psychosocial support may benefit from adopting a dyadic perspective, acknowledging that each parent’s appraisal of the situation can shape the partner’s adjustment. (Table presented.)