Research in the Digital Humanities requires computer systems that can document and analyze interpretations of creative works, such as literary texts. These systems are designed to provide access to existing interpretations and identify their similarities and differences. To this end, we propose an approach to formally representing interpretations. In particular, we develop an ontology of observations aimed at capturing, through what we call observational vocabularies, what interpreters claim about the texts that they interpret. We distinguish between different types of observations, in particular, basic observations, which represent specific and domain-dependent claims (e.g., regarding the analysis of literary characters’ traits), and observations such as assertion, denial, support, and defeat to document more nuanced claims. We also introduce formal mechanisms that can be used to analyze particular (sets of) observations, texts, and so on. Throughout the article, we illustrate the discussion with examples from literary studies.
An Observational Approach to Representing Interpretation / C. Masolo, E.M.S.. - In: APPLIED ONTOLOGY. - ISSN 1570-5838. - 20:4(2025 Nov), pp. 381-403. [10.1177/15705838251391711]
An Observational Approach to Representing Interpretation
R. Ferrario;M.M. VilardoUltimo
2025
Abstract
Research in the Digital Humanities requires computer systems that can document and analyze interpretations of creative works, such as literary texts. These systems are designed to provide access to existing interpretations and identify their similarities and differences. To this end, we propose an approach to formally representing interpretations. In particular, we develop an ontology of observations aimed at capturing, through what we call observational vocabularies, what interpreters claim about the texts that they interpret. We distinguish between different types of observations, in particular, basic observations, which represent specific and domain-dependent claims (e.g., regarding the analysis of literary characters’ traits), and observations such as assertion, denial, support, and defeat to document more nuanced claims. We also introduce formal mechanisms that can be used to analyze particular (sets of) observations, texts, and so on. Throughout the article, we illustrate the discussion with examples from literary studies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AO_mite.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
366.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
366.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




