Background: The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has improved outcomes in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC), including in patients with bone metastases. Assessing their comparative effectiveness in real-world settings is crucial. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study (January 2019–December 2023; median follow-up 39 months) evaluated the real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in HR+/HER2- mBC patients with bone metastases. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary exploratory endpoint. A total of 1399 patients with ECOG PS 0–1 and at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Analyses used propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for confounding. Results: Palbociclib showed shorter rwPFS (22 months) compared to abemaciclib (32 months; HR = 1.47, p = 0.001) and ribociclib (35 months; HR = 1.49, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between abemaciclib and ribociclib. OS was also lower with palbociclib (47 months) versus abemaciclib (60 months; HR = 1.77, p < 0.001) and ribociclib (64 months; HR = 1.69, p = 0.001). Results were consistent after PSM and IPTW adjustment. CONCLUSION: Ribociclib and abemaciclib may provide superior rwPFS and OS compared to palbociclib in HR+/HER2- mBC patients with bone metastases.
Comparative real-world progression free survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients with bone metastases / R. Scafetta, M.D.. - In: THE ONCOLOGIST. - ISSN 1083-7159. - 31:5(2026 May), pp. oyag146.1-oyag146.13. [10.1093/oncolo/oyag146]
Comparative real-world progression free survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients with bone metastases
C. Criscitiello;C. Sposetti;C. Vernieri;G. Curigliano;
2026
Abstract
Background: The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has improved outcomes in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC), including in patients with bone metastases. Assessing their comparative effectiveness in real-world settings is crucial. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study (January 2019–December 2023; median follow-up 39 months) evaluated the real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in HR+/HER2- mBC patients with bone metastases. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary exploratory endpoint. A total of 1399 patients with ECOG PS 0–1 and at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Analyses used propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for confounding. Results: Palbociclib showed shorter rwPFS (22 months) compared to abemaciclib (32 months; HR = 1.47, p = 0.001) and ribociclib (35 months; HR = 1.49, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between abemaciclib and ribociclib. OS was also lower with palbociclib (47 months) versus abemaciclib (60 months; HR = 1.77, p < 0.001) and ribociclib (64 months; HR = 1.69, p = 0.001). Results were consistent after PSM and IPTW adjustment. CONCLUSION: Ribociclib and abemaciclib may provide superior rwPFS and OS compared to palbociclib in HR+/HER2- mBC patients with bone metastases.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
oyag146.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.55 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.55 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




