Surgical resection represents the standard of care in diffuse glioma, and more extensive tumour resection appears to be associated with favourable outcome. Up to now, terminology to describe extent of resection has been inconsistently applied across clinical trials which hampers comparative analysis of cohorts between different studies. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we developed evidence-based expert recommendations on categories for extent of resection. Recommendations are formulated for the categories ‘biopsy’, ‘partial resection’, ‘subtotal resection’, ‘near total resection’, ‘complete resection’ and ‘supramaximal resection’. Definitions rest on reduction of contrast- and non–contrast-enhancing tumour in glioblastoma, and on reduction of T2/FLAIR-hyperintense tumour in gliomas WHO grade 2 or 3. Both relative reduction of tumour volume (in percentage) as a measurement of surgical efficacy and absolute residual tumour volume (in cm3) as a measurement of remaining tumour burden are incorporated into the categories for extent of resection. Class of evidence for the proposed categories ranges from class IIB to IV. Limitations of the suggested categories are discussed. The proposed categories on extent of resection offer a framework to standardize nomenclature based on previous studies, and will need to be evaluated in prospective, molecularly well-defined cohorts. Our categories may eventually help as a stratification factor for future clinical trials.

Evidence-based recommendations on categories for extent of resection in diffuse glioma / P. Karschnia, M.A. Vogelbaum, M. Van Den Bent, D.P. Cahill, L. Bello, Y. Narita, M.S. Berger, M. Weller, J.-. Tonn. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0959-8049. - 149:(2021 May), pp. 23-33. [10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.002]

Evidence-based recommendations on categories for extent of resection in diffuse glioma

L. Bello;
2021

Abstract

Surgical resection represents the standard of care in diffuse glioma, and more extensive tumour resection appears to be associated with favourable outcome. Up to now, terminology to describe extent of resection has been inconsistently applied across clinical trials which hampers comparative analysis of cohorts between different studies. Based on a comprehensive literature review, we developed evidence-based expert recommendations on categories for extent of resection. Recommendations are formulated for the categories ‘biopsy’, ‘partial resection’, ‘subtotal resection’, ‘near total resection’, ‘complete resection’ and ‘supramaximal resection’. Definitions rest on reduction of contrast- and non–contrast-enhancing tumour in glioblastoma, and on reduction of T2/FLAIR-hyperintense tumour in gliomas WHO grade 2 or 3. Both relative reduction of tumour volume (in percentage) as a measurement of surgical efficacy and absolute residual tumour volume (in cm3) as a measurement of remaining tumour burden are incorporated into the categories for extent of resection. Class of evidence for the proposed categories ranges from class IIB to IV. Limitations of the suggested categories are discussed. The proposed categories on extent of resection offer a framework to standardize nomenclature based on previous studies, and will need to be evaluated in prospective, molecularly well-defined cohorts. Our categories may eventually help as a stratification factor for future clinical trials.
Diffuse glioma; Extent of resection; Glioblastoma; MRI; Nomenclature; Surgical resection
Settore MEDS-15/A - Neurochirurgia
mag-2021
2-apr-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS0959804921001490.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 419.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
419.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1243016
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 107
  • Scopus 177
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 167
  • OpenAlex 208
social impact