Purpose The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has increased the incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs). In this context, overtreatment represents a major concern, particularly for lesions < 2 cm. Most evidence derives from retrospective registries, whereas prospective data remain limited. Methods This multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in five European centers between January 2015 and July 2021. Seventy-six patients aged > 50 years with asymptomatic, unilateral SRM < 2 cm were enrolled and followed under a structured prospective active surveillance (AS) protocol with periodic axial imaging. Active treatment was recommended according to predefined progression criteria or patient preference. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS); secondary endpoints included treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results 69 patients were included in the analyses. After a median follow-up of 88 months, 8-year EFS and TFS were 66% and 83%, respectively. 17% of patients required active treatment, mainly due to tumor growth. The 8-year OS and CSM were 88% and 9.6%. One patient died of metastatic RCC. Shorter tumor doubling time (DT) (< 12 years) and high RENAL score were significantly associated with higher risks of event and treatment. Endophytic tumors, and higher PADUA score also predicted adverse outcomes. Conclusion Long-term follow-up confirms AS as the standard initial option for selected patients with SRMs <= 2 cm, with a low rate of progression and optimal survival rates. Tumor DT and mass location should be considered in clinical decision-making to identify patients who will deserve a deferred treatment in case of progression.
Active surveillance for renal masses up to 2 cm: long-term oncological outcomes from a prospective multi-institutional study / C. Re, A. Bertini, P. Scilipoti, T. Saccucci, G. Mantica, W. Cazzaniga, R. Matloob, G. Conti, C. Maccagnano, M. Furlan, N. Suardi, C. Simeone, E. Montanari, G. Albo, S. Stagni, R. Salvioni, F. Castiglione, A. Larcher, G. Rosiello, C. Terrone, F. Montorsi, A. Salonia, U. Capitanio, R. Bertini. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 1433-8726. - 44:1(2026 Apr 28), pp. 327.1-327.9. [10.1007/s00345-026-06424-y]
Active surveillance for renal masses up to 2 cm: long-term oncological outcomes from a prospective multi-institutional study
E. Montanari;G. Albo;
2026
Abstract
Purpose The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging has increased the incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs). In this context, overtreatment represents a major concern, particularly for lesions < 2 cm. Most evidence derives from retrospective registries, whereas prospective data remain limited. Methods This multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in five European centers between January 2015 and July 2021. Seventy-six patients aged > 50 years with asymptomatic, unilateral SRM < 2 cm were enrolled and followed under a structured prospective active surveillance (AS) protocol with periodic axial imaging. Active treatment was recommended according to predefined progression criteria or patient preference. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS); secondary endpoints included treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results 69 patients were included in the analyses. After a median follow-up of 88 months, 8-year EFS and TFS were 66% and 83%, respectively. 17% of patients required active treatment, mainly due to tumor growth. The 8-year OS and CSM were 88% and 9.6%. One patient died of metastatic RCC. Shorter tumor doubling time (DT) (< 12 years) and high RENAL score were significantly associated with higher risks of event and treatment. Endophytic tumors, and higher PADUA score also predicted adverse outcomes. Conclusion Long-term follow-up confirms AS as the standard initial option for selected patients with SRMs <= 2 cm, with a low rate of progression and optimal survival rates. Tumor DT and mass location should be considered in clinical decision-making to identify patients who will deserve a deferred treatment in case of progression.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s00345-026-06424-y.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
872.14 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
872.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




