Introduction: A reliable quantification of hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA is of paramount importance for monitoring patients under antiviral therapy. This quality control study compares the diagnostic performances of quantitative HDV-RNA assays used in clinical practice. Methods: Two HDV-RNA sample panels were quantified in 30 centers by RoboGene (N = 9 laboratories), EurobioPlex (N = 7), RealStar (N = 4), AltoStar (N = 1), Bosphore (N = 3), Bosphore-on-InGenius (N = 1), Dia.Pro (N = 2), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (N = 1) and 3 in-house assays. Panel A and B comprised 8 serial dilutions of WHO/HDV standard (range: 0.5–5.0 log10 IU/ml) and 20 clinical samples (range: 0.5–6.0 log10 IU/ml), respectively. The following parameters were determined: sensitivity by 95 % LOD (limit of detection), precision by intra- and inter-run CV (coefficient of variation), accuracy by the differences between expected-observed HDV-RNA, linearity by linear regression analysis. Results: 95 % LOD varied across assays and centers underlining heterogeneous sensitivities: AltoStar had the lowest 95 % LOD (3 IU/ml) followed by RealStar (10 [min–max: 3–316] IU/ml), Bosphore-on-InGenius (10 IU/ml), RoboGene (31 [3–316] IU/ml), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (31 IU/ml) and EuroBioplex (100 [100–316] IU/ml). Moreover, 6 assays (RoboGene, EurobioPlex, RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and In-house) showed <0.5 log10 IU/ml differences between expected and observed HDV-RNA for all dilutions while other assays had >1 log10 IU/ml underestimations. RealStar, Bosphore-on-InGenius and EurobioPlex had the highest precision (mean intra-run CV < 20 %). Inter-run CV was higher for all assays, with CVs < 25 % for RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and EurobioPlex. Seven assays (RoboGene/AltoStar/RealStar/EurobioPlex/Nuclear-Laser-Medicine/In-house) showed a good linearity (R2 > 0.90), but for HDV-RNA < 1000 IU/ml only Bosphore-on-InGenius, AltoStar, RealStar and Robogene showed a R2 > 0.85. Conclusions: This study underlines heterogeneous sensitivities (inter- and intraassays), that could hamper proper HDV-RNA quantification, particularly at low viral loads. This raises the need to improve the diagnostic performance of most assays for properly identifying virological response to anti-HDV drugs.
Comparison of diagnostic performances of HDV-RNA quantification assays used in clinical practice: Results from a national quality control multicenter study / R. Salpini, L. Piermatteo, G. Caviglia, A. Bertoli, M. Brunetto, B. Bruzzone, A. Callegaro, C. Caudai, D. Cavallone, L. Chessa, F. Coghe, N. Coppola, N. Cuomo, S. D'Anna, M. Di Stefano, F. Facchetti, C. Farina, D. Ferraro, E. Franchin, D. Francisci, S. Galli, A. Garbuglia, W. Gennari, V. Ghisetti, P. Lampertico, S. Lo Caputo, N. Marascio, S. Menzo, V. Micheli, G. Niro, A. Olivero, P. Paba, C. Palermo, O. Palmieri, S. Paolucci, M. Pisaturo, T. Pollicino, G. Raffa, T. Santantonio, G. Torre, O. Turriziani, S. Uzzau, S.C. Uceda Renteria, M. Vatteroni, M. Zazzi, A. Craxì, F. Ceccherini-Silberstein, V. Svicher, (. Hcv Virology Italian Resistance Network, M. Arosio, S. Bastianelli, A. Gentile, F. Giardina, A. Gidari, R. Govoni, G. Ibba, A. Loglio, A. Lombardi, C. Mascarella, F. Maggi, G. Matera, C. Mazzei, M. Milia, A. Quirino, A. Raddi, R. Scioscia, S. Tagliazucchi, M. Totaro, R. Valaperta. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY. - ISSN 1386-6532. - 180:(2025 Oct), pp. 105850.1-105850.11. [10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105850]
Comparison of diagnostic performances of HDV-RNA quantification assays used in clinical practice: Results from a national quality control multicenter study
A. Bertoli;A. Callegaro;F. Facchetti;D. Ferraro;P. Lampertico;V. Micheli;S.C. Uceda Renteria;M. Arosio;A. Loglio;F. Maggi;C. Mazzei;R. Scioscia;M. Totaro;R. ValapertaUltimo
2025
Abstract
Introduction: A reliable quantification of hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA is of paramount importance for monitoring patients under antiviral therapy. This quality control study compares the diagnostic performances of quantitative HDV-RNA assays used in clinical practice. Methods: Two HDV-RNA sample panels were quantified in 30 centers by RoboGene (N = 9 laboratories), EurobioPlex (N = 7), RealStar (N = 4), AltoStar (N = 1), Bosphore (N = 3), Bosphore-on-InGenius (N = 1), Dia.Pro (N = 2), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (N = 1) and 3 in-house assays. Panel A and B comprised 8 serial dilutions of WHO/HDV standard (range: 0.5–5.0 log10 IU/ml) and 20 clinical samples (range: 0.5–6.0 log10 IU/ml), respectively. The following parameters were determined: sensitivity by 95 % LOD (limit of detection), precision by intra- and inter-run CV (coefficient of variation), accuracy by the differences between expected-observed HDV-RNA, linearity by linear regression analysis. Results: 95 % LOD varied across assays and centers underlining heterogeneous sensitivities: AltoStar had the lowest 95 % LOD (3 IU/ml) followed by RealStar (10 [min–max: 3–316] IU/ml), Bosphore-on-InGenius (10 IU/ml), RoboGene (31 [3–316] IU/ml), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (31 IU/ml) and EuroBioplex (100 [100–316] IU/ml). Moreover, 6 assays (RoboGene, EurobioPlex, RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and In-house) showed <0.5 log10 IU/ml differences between expected and observed HDV-RNA for all dilutions while other assays had >1 log10 IU/ml underestimations. RealStar, Bosphore-on-InGenius and EurobioPlex had the highest precision (mean intra-run CV < 20 %). Inter-run CV was higher for all assays, with CVs < 25 % for RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and EurobioPlex. Seven assays (RoboGene/AltoStar/RealStar/EurobioPlex/Nuclear-Laser-Medicine/In-house) showed a good linearity (R2 > 0.90), but for HDV-RNA < 1000 IU/ml only Bosphore-on-InGenius, AltoStar, RealStar and Robogene showed a R2 > 0.85. Conclusions: This study underlines heterogeneous sensitivities (inter- and intraassays), that could hamper proper HDV-RNA quantification, particularly at low viral loads. This raises the need to improve the diagnostic performance of most assays for properly identifying virological response to anti-HDV drugs.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1386653225000927-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
3.28 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.28 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




