This paper examines how John Tzetzes engages with classical antiquity in his Poem on Metres through two complementary case studies. Although the work is a technical didactic poem on Greek metrical forms, its proem unexpectedly opens with a lament for his brother Isaac, introducing a personal and emotional dimension. This opening is not merely spontaneous but shaped by literary models, particularly Euripides. A second passage illustrates a different mode of engagement, in which antiquity functions as a grammatical and exegetical archive. In discussing the cretic foot, Tzetzes employs compounds such as καλλίπαις and the rare αἰσχρόπαις. The latter, scarcely attested, also appears in a scholion to the Phoenissae, raising questions about textual transmission and scholarly practice. This parallel suggests that both Tzetzes and later scholiasts may draw on a shared grammatical tradition, possibly rooted in Byzantine educational contexts. These case studies highlight the dual nature of Tzetzes’ relationship with antiquity: as a source of literary inspiration and as a repository of scholarly material. More broadly, the paper raises a methodological question central to Byzantine studies: whether the reuse of classical elements reflects direct engagement with ancient texts or mediation through inherited exegetical traditions, and how one may distinguish between conscious intertextuality and the use of a conventionalised classical idiom.
Engaging Antiquity in John Tzetzes: Two Case Studies / G. Mendicino. Euripides in Context: New Perspectives on the Transmission and Reception of Ancient Greek Literature Oxford 2026.
Engaging Antiquity in John Tzetzes: Two Case Studies
G. Mendicino
2026
Abstract
This paper examines how John Tzetzes engages with classical antiquity in his Poem on Metres through two complementary case studies. Although the work is a technical didactic poem on Greek metrical forms, its proem unexpectedly opens with a lament for his brother Isaac, introducing a personal and emotional dimension. This opening is not merely spontaneous but shaped by literary models, particularly Euripides. A second passage illustrates a different mode of engagement, in which antiquity functions as a grammatical and exegetical archive. In discussing the cretic foot, Tzetzes employs compounds such as καλλίπαις and the rare αἰσχρόπαις. The latter, scarcely attested, also appears in a scholion to the Phoenissae, raising questions about textual transmission and scholarly practice. This parallel suggests that both Tzetzes and later scholiasts may draw on a shared grammatical tradition, possibly rooted in Byzantine educational contexts. These case studies highlight the dual nature of Tzetzes’ relationship with antiquity: as a source of literary inspiration and as a repository of scholarly material. More broadly, the paper raises a methodological question central to Byzantine studies: whether the reuse of classical elements reflects direct engagement with ancient texts or mediation through inherited exegetical traditions, and how one may distinguish between conscious intertextuality and the use of a conventionalised classical idiom.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




