Robotic ventral hernia repair (VHR) is increasingly common, yet predicting operative time remains challenging. No study has yet applied machine learning (ML) to this setting. Objective To compare ML models for predicting operative time in elective robotic VHR and identify key preoperative predictors. Methods Retrospective single-center cohort study (AZORG Hospital, Aalst, Belgium) including 208 consecutive patients undergoing elective robotic VHR (October 2020–April 2025). Three models—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Ridge Regression—were trained with 5-fold cross-validation using demographics, BMI, EHS hernia size, mesh position, and surgical complexity. Performance was assessed by MAE, RMSE, and R²; feature importance by SHAP analysis. Results Median operative time was 90 min (IQR 60–130). Random Forest achieved the best performance (MAE 38.0 min, RMSE 52.8 min, R² 0.22), outperforming Gradient Boosting (R² 0.01) and Ridge Regression (R² −0.53). SHAP identified mesh position (45.0%), hernia size (30.7%), and BMI (14.2%) as the top predictors. Conclusion In this pilot study, Random Forest provided modest operative time predictions (R² 0.22). Limited explained variance likely reflects the absence of surgeon experience and intraoperative variables. Although mesh position and hernia size are clinically consistent predictors, current accuracy is insufficient for clinical implementation. Larger multicenter studies incorporating surgeon-level data are needed.

Predicting operative time in robotic ventral hernia repair using machine learning: a retrospective pilot study / F. Brucchi, A. Gori, I. Van Campenhout, J. Colpaert, K. Boterbergh, P. Potvlieghe, T. Violante, M. Rottoli, G. Dionigi, F. Muysoms, B.V.D. Bossche. - In: LANGENBECK'S ARCHIVES OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1435-2451. - (2026), pp. 1-18. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s00423-026-04057-8]

Predicting operative time in robotic ventral hernia repair using machine learning: a retrospective pilot study

F. Brucchi
Primo
;
M. Rottoli;G. Dionigi;
2026

Abstract

Robotic ventral hernia repair (VHR) is increasingly common, yet predicting operative time remains challenging. No study has yet applied machine learning (ML) to this setting. Objective To compare ML models for predicting operative time in elective robotic VHR and identify key preoperative predictors. Methods Retrospective single-center cohort study (AZORG Hospital, Aalst, Belgium) including 208 consecutive patients undergoing elective robotic VHR (October 2020–April 2025). Three models—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Ridge Regression—were trained with 5-fold cross-validation using demographics, BMI, EHS hernia size, mesh position, and surgical complexity. Performance was assessed by MAE, RMSE, and R²; feature importance by SHAP analysis. Results Median operative time was 90 min (IQR 60–130). Random Forest achieved the best performance (MAE 38.0 min, RMSE 52.8 min, R² 0.22), outperforming Gradient Boosting (R² 0.01) and Ridge Regression (R² −0.53). SHAP identified mesh position (45.0%), hernia size (30.7%), and BMI (14.2%) as the top predictors. Conclusion In this pilot study, Random Forest provided modest operative time predictions (R² 0.22). Limited explained variance likely reflects the absence of surgeon experience and intraoperative variables. Although mesh position and hernia size are clinically consistent predictors, current accuracy is insufficient for clinical implementation. Larger multicenter studies incorporating surgeon-level data are needed.
Settore MEDS-06/A - Chirurgia generale
2026
24-apr-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00423-026-04057-8_reference.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 805.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
805.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1238615
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact