Background: The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Materials and methods: we searched the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) data warehouse for clinically LABC cT4a-d – in the 2013–2022 timeframe. Results: Of a total of 132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.83 %) and 977 with inflammatory (T4d) BCs (0.74 %), of whom 542/2427 (20.1 %) and 251/977 (25.6 %), respectively, had metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.054. Ninety percent of patients with cT4abcM0 and 88.8 % of patients with cT4dM0 disease had surgery (p = 0.369) and 90.9 % and 88.7 % (p = 0.187) endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant CT, biological drugs and radiotherapy were given in 33.2 %, 47.0 %, 67.1 % and 61.1 % of cT4abcM0 cases compared to 77.3 %, 80.4 %, 87.7 % and 80.2 % of cT4dM0 cases (all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age <70 years, luminal A and HER-2 pure subtype, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment (all p ≤ 0.034) were determinants of better overall survival (OS). Local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly lower in patients receiving radiotherapy or endocrine therapy (p ≤ 0.012). Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis. Conclusions: The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.
Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience / P. Van Dam, M. Tomatis, A. Ponti, L. Marotti, J. Verhaegen, C. Aristei, M.J. Cardoso, K.L. Cheung, G. Curigliano, J. De Vries, D. Santini, F. Sardanelli, I.T. Rubio, C.A.P. Anghelone, A. Baldissera, E. Benozzi, M. Berlière, B. Bussels, K. Cagossi, N. Caldana, F. Caruso, C. Cedolini, F. Corsi, E. Despierre, L. Despini, B. Dullens, A.J. Esgueva, G. Fogazzi, L. Fortunato, J.L. Fougo, D. Generali, A. Gennari, M. Ghilli, P.F. Gouveia, S. Grossi, J. Heiman, R. Helfgott, A. Huscher, H. Loobuyck, M.E. Edith Lüthy, S. Marquette, G. Melucci, F. Piacentini, A. Prové, F. Riccardi, K. Rogowski, G. Romanucci, L. Rossi, C.R. Santos, S. Scomersi, G. Staelens, M. Vassilieff, V. Venizelos, P. Veronesi, C. Zamagni, D. Zanoni. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - 52:3(2026 Mar), pp. 111303.1-111303.8. [10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111303]
Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience
G. Curigliano;F. Corsi;L. Despini;D. Generali;P. Veronesi;
2026
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Materials and methods: we searched the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) data warehouse for clinically LABC cT4a-d – in the 2013–2022 timeframe. Results: Of a total of 132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.83 %) and 977 with inflammatory (T4d) BCs (0.74 %), of whom 542/2427 (20.1 %) and 251/977 (25.6 %), respectively, had metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.054. Ninety percent of patients with cT4abcM0 and 88.8 % of patients with cT4dM0 disease had surgery (p = 0.369) and 90.9 % and 88.7 % (p = 0.187) endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant CT, biological drugs and radiotherapy were given in 33.2 %, 47.0 %, 67.1 % and 61.1 % of cT4abcM0 cases compared to 77.3 %, 80.4 %, 87.7 % and 80.2 % of cT4dM0 cases (all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age <70 years, luminal A and HER-2 pure subtype, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment (all p ≤ 0.034) were determinants of better overall survival (OS). Local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly lower in patients receiving radiotherapy or endocrine therapy (p ≤ 0.012). Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis. Conclusions: The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0748798325017317-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
736.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
736.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




