Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer worldwide. If lesions are not treated for years or relapse after surgery and/or radiotherapy, they can become ‘locally advanced’ (laBCC). In some challenging BCC patients, the risk of a significant functional/aesthetic deficit advises against both complete surgical resection and radiotherapy. Medical therapies, such as the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) sonidegib, may be helpful to make patients eligible for other potentially curative techniques or for the long-term management of refractory cases or cases that are unsuitable for surgery and radiotherapy. A multidisciplinary board organized a Delphi consensus to understand the agreement around the cytoreductive HHI approach. Methods A Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7-point Likert scale) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian specialists with clinical activity/expertise in laBCC. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues' responses. Results Forty-seven panelists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 16/17 statements of the Delphi, at the second round, more than 75% of panelists assigned a score of 4 or more reaching agreement; these statements also reached a high consensus, as the panelists assigned similar scores, with a low interquartile range. Conclusions In the absence of solid scientific evidence, this article offers consensus-based recommendations on which patients may benefit from cytoreductive HHI, how to conduct the cytoreductive therapy, how to assess response to it and how to perform the surgery.

Evaluation of Sonidegib Cytoreductive Activity in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Delphi Consensus / P. Antonio Ascierto, M. Concetta Fargnoli, C. Caracò, E. Dika, M. Mandalà, D. Massi, A. Paradisi, A. Portincasa, P. Quaglino, P. Queirolo, L. Tagliaferri, K. Peris, G. Antonini Cappellini, M. Ardigò, G. Argenziano, S. Asero, F. Bassetto, G. Beltramini, P. Bonomo, L. Borgognoni, P. Bossi, V. Caliendo, P. Calzavara Pinton, U. Cortinovis, R. Depenni, L. Fania, B. Fionda, C. Iotti, A. Janowska, E. Migliano, V. Panasiti, R. Patuzzo, F. Picciotto, A. Reali, M. Saponara, P. Savoia, F. Savoia, M. Scalvenzi, F. Spagnolo, F. Stagno D'Alcontres, I. Stanganelli, G. Tosti, A. Vavassori, F. Venturi, L. Vicenzi, I. Zalaudek. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0011-9059. - 65:3(2026 Mar), pp. 543-552. [10.1111/ijd.70103]

Evaluation of Sonidegib Cytoreductive Activity in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Delphi Consensus

G. Beltramini
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2026

Abstract

Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer worldwide. If lesions are not treated for years or relapse after surgery and/or radiotherapy, they can become ‘locally advanced’ (laBCC). In some challenging BCC patients, the risk of a significant functional/aesthetic deficit advises against both complete surgical resection and radiotherapy. Medical therapies, such as the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) sonidegib, may be helpful to make patients eligible for other potentially curative techniques or for the long-term management of refractory cases or cases that are unsuitable for surgery and radiotherapy. A multidisciplinary board organized a Delphi consensus to understand the agreement around the cytoreductive HHI approach. Methods A Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7-point Likert scale) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian specialists with clinical activity/expertise in laBCC. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues' responses. Results Forty-seven panelists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 16/17 statements of the Delphi, at the second round, more than 75% of panelists assigned a score of 4 or more reaching agreement; these statements also reached a high consensus, as the panelists assigned similar scores, with a low interquartile range. Conclusions In the absence of solid scientific evidence, this article offers consensus-based recommendations on which patients may benefit from cytoreductive HHI, how to conduct the cytoreductive therapy, how to assess response to it and how to perform the surgery.
Settore MEDS-15/B - Chirurgia maxillo-facciale
Settore MEDS-09/A - Oncologia medica
Settore MEDS-10/C - Malattie cutanee e veneree
mar-2026
21-ott-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Int J Dermatology - 2025 - Ascierto - Evaluation of Sonidegib Cytoreductive Activity in Locally Advanced Basal Cell.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 448.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
448.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1232191
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 1
social impact