Background Current guidelines recommend evaluating patients with ambulatory heart failure (HF) for heart transplantation if their peak oxygen consumption (peak VO 2) is <12 mL/kg/min. However, these recommendations are based on decades-old data. Methods We retrospectively analysed 8060 patients with ambulatory HF with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data. The primary analysis focused on 1218 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min, enrolled between 2010 and 2022. Survival outcomes (composite of death/left ventricular assist device/heart transplantation) were compared with those of heart transplantation recipients from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry. Patients were stratified by ventilatory efficiency (ventilation versus CO 2 production slope (VE/VCO 2) >34 vs ≤34) and presence of exercise oscillatory ventilation. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves compared with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models, with heart transplantation survival curves reconstructed from aggregate data. Results Patients with peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min demonstrated better survival than heart transplantation recipients, with survival curves intersecting at approximately 2.7 years. Among those with VE/VCO 2 ≤34, 10-year mortality risk was halved (p<0.01), with survival curves crossing those of heart transplantation recipients around year 4. Absence of exercise oscillatory ventilation was similarly associated with a 50% lower long-term mortality. Combining VE/VCO 2 and exercise oscillatory ventilation identified four distinct risk groups with significantly different 10-year outcomes (p<0.01). Patients with peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min, VE/VCO 2 ≤34 and no exercise oscillatory ventilation exhibited survival comparable to heart transplantation recipients at year 5. Conclusions In contemporary practice, a peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min alone may not reliably identify patients with HF with sufficiently high short-term mortality to warrant heart transplantation referral. VE/VCO 2 and exercise oscillatory ventilation provide important additional risk stratification, supporting re-evaluation of transplant referral criteria to reflect improved HF management and outcomes.
Cardiopulmonary exercise test criteria for heart transplantation referral of patients with ambulatory heart failure in the current era / M. Azar, A. Apostolo, E. Salvioni, A. Galotta, M. Emdin, M. Piepoli, A. Palazzuoli, G. Sinagra, D. Magrì, S. Paolillo, M. Mapelli, J. Campodonico, U. Corrà, R. Raimondo, A. Cittadini, A. Iorio, A. Salzano, R. Badagliacca, M. Senni, P. Perrone-Filardi, M. Correale, E. Perna, M. Metra, C. Vignati, M.C. Contini, N. Baracchini, G. Cattadori, M. Guazzi, G. Limongelli, G. Parati, B. Pezzuto, R. Willixhofer, P. Palermo, M.V. Matassini, F. Bandera, M. Bussotti, E. Carulli, F. Re, A.B. Scardovi, S. Sciomer, A. Passantino, D. Girola, C. Passino, L. Adamo, P. Agostoni. - In: HEART. - ISSN 1468-201X. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327208]
Cardiopulmonary exercise test criteria for heart transplantation referral of patients with ambulatory heart failure in the current era
E. Salvioni;M. Piepoli;M. Mapelli;J. Campodonico;C. Vignati;G. Cattadori;M. Guazzi;F. Bandera;E. Carulli;D. Girola;P. Agostoni
Ultimo
2026
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend evaluating patients with ambulatory heart failure (HF) for heart transplantation if their peak oxygen consumption (peak VO 2) is <12 mL/kg/min. However, these recommendations are based on decades-old data. Methods We retrospectively analysed 8060 patients with ambulatory HF with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data. The primary analysis focused on 1218 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min, enrolled between 2010 and 2022. Survival outcomes (composite of death/left ventricular assist device/heart transplantation) were compared with those of heart transplantation recipients from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry. Patients were stratified by ventilatory efficiency (ventilation versus CO 2 production slope (VE/VCO 2) >34 vs ≤34) and presence of exercise oscillatory ventilation. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves compared with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models, with heart transplantation survival curves reconstructed from aggregate data. Results Patients with peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min demonstrated better survival than heart transplantation recipients, with survival curves intersecting at approximately 2.7 years. Among those with VE/VCO 2 ≤34, 10-year mortality risk was halved (p<0.01), with survival curves crossing those of heart transplantation recipients around year 4. Absence of exercise oscillatory ventilation was similarly associated with a 50% lower long-term mortality. Combining VE/VCO 2 and exercise oscillatory ventilation identified four distinct risk groups with significantly different 10-year outcomes (p<0.01). Patients with peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min, VE/VCO 2 ≤34 and no exercise oscillatory ventilation exhibited survival comparable to heart transplantation recipients at year 5. Conclusions In contemporary practice, a peak VO 2 <12 mL/kg/min alone may not reliably identify patients with HF with sufficiently high short-term mortality to warrant heart transplantation referral. VE/VCO 2 and exercise oscillatory ventilation provide important additional risk stratification, supporting re-evaluation of transplant referral criteria to reflect improved HF management and outcomes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cardiopulmonary exercise test criteria.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
heartjnl-2025-327208.full.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




