This paper addresses the issue of welfare chauvinism by shifting the analysis from the national to the subnational level, a crucial yet less visible sphere for the provision of social rights. It examines how regional and municipal administrations have leveraged their institutional autonomy to implement discriminatory policies, which were successively removed thanks to the strategic and pro bono advocacy of ASGI. After outlining the research design that guided the selection of 32 case studies, the article identifies five types of direct and indirect bureaucratic criteria of exclusion, explaining how chauvinism has become increasingly subtle and sophisticated. This study also examines the real and rhetorical function of bans, which are used to communicate the political idea of defending local welfare from immigrants. This sentiment is further demonstrated through an analysis of how subnational administrations attempt, in various ways, to contest, circumvent, or even resist court decisions. The article concludes with a broader reflection, discussing the sense of anti-discrimination advocacy and the paradox emerging between the economic demand for immigrant workers and their social exclusion at the local level.

Sciovinismo locale. Profili discriminatori nelle politiche di accesso degli immigrati al welfare territoriale = Local chauvinism. discriminatory patterns in immigrants’ access to subnational welfare / S.D. Molli. - In: POLITICHE SOCIALI. - ISSN 2284-2098. - 12:3(2025 Dec), pp. 689-711. [10.7389/120044]

Sciovinismo locale. Profili discriminatori nelle politiche di accesso degli immigrati al welfare territoriale = Local chauvinism. discriminatory patterns in immigrants’ access to subnational welfare

S.D. Molli
2025

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of welfare chauvinism by shifting the analysis from the national to the subnational level, a crucial yet less visible sphere for the provision of social rights. It examines how regional and municipal administrations have leveraged their institutional autonomy to implement discriminatory policies, which were successively removed thanks to the strategic and pro bono advocacy of ASGI. After outlining the research design that guided the selection of 32 case studies, the article identifies five types of direct and indirect bureaucratic criteria of exclusion, explaining how chauvinism has become increasingly subtle and sophisticated. This study also examines the real and rhetorical function of bans, which are used to communicate the political idea of defending local welfare from immigrants. This sentiment is further demonstrated through an analysis of how subnational administrations attempt, in various ways, to contest, circumvent, or even resist court decisions. The article concludes with a broader reflection, discussing the sense of anti-discrimination advocacy and the paradox emerging between the economic demand for immigrant workers and their social exclusion at the local level.
Welfare Chauvinism; Local Chauvinism; Institutional Discrimination; Local Welfare; Immigration Advocacy;
Settore GSPS-08/A - Sociologia dei processi economici e del lavoro
Settore GSPS-08/B - Sociologia dell'ambiente e del territorio
Settore GSPS-05/A - Sociologia generale
Settore GSPS-06/A - Sociologia dei processi culturali e comunicativi
Settore GSPS-07/A - Sociologia dei fenomeni politici
dic-2025
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.7389/120044
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SDM.Sciovinismo.Locale.Immigrazione.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 775.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
775.64 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1229760
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact