This chapter examines how British newspapers reported and framed the devastating 1783 Calabrian and Sicilian earthquake sequence, with particular attention to the portrayal of Messina. Drawing on a corpus of seventy articles published between March and October 1783, the study combines digital humanities methods with comparative discourse analysis to explore the interplay of factual reportage, rhetorical strategy and ideological framing. It argues that the press did more than inform: it shaped readers’ emotional and political responses through recurring tropes— including sublime imagery, scientific authority, and narratives of royal compassion. The case of Sir William Hamilton is analysed as an anchor of epistemic credibility, while representations of King Ferdinand illustrate the ideological function of disaster discourse as a form of soft diplomacy. The paper also traces the influence of earlier British travel writing on the narrative structures used to describe Sicily, demonstrating how pre-existing cultural scripts informed the reception of seismic news. Ultimately, the chapter situates this coverage within broader Enlightenment concerns with knowledge, identity, and transnational alignment, showing how disasters became key sites of meaning-making in eighteenth-century media.
“Shaking Foundations”: Unearthing Fact and Ideology in British Press Reports of the 1783 Earthquake in Sicily / M. Sturiale - In: Fact and Ideology in the Reporting of News about Italy from 1600 to the Unification / [a cura di] N. Brownlees, B. Dooley, S.U. Baldassarri. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2026. - ISBN 978-1-0364-6764-7. - pp. 95-115
“Shaking Foundations”: Unearthing Fact and Ideology in British Press Reports of the 1783 Earthquake in Sicily
M. Sturiale
Primo
2026
Abstract
This chapter examines how British newspapers reported and framed the devastating 1783 Calabrian and Sicilian earthquake sequence, with particular attention to the portrayal of Messina. Drawing on a corpus of seventy articles published between March and October 1783, the study combines digital humanities methods with comparative discourse analysis to explore the interplay of factual reportage, rhetorical strategy and ideological framing. It argues that the press did more than inform: it shaped readers’ emotional and political responses through recurring tropes— including sublime imagery, scientific authority, and narratives of royal compassion. The case of Sir William Hamilton is analysed as an anchor of epistemic credibility, while representations of King Ferdinand illustrate the ideological function of disaster discourse as a form of soft diplomacy. The paper also traces the influence of earlier British travel writing on the narrative structures used to describe Sicily, demonstrating how pre-existing cultural scripts informed the reception of seismic news. Ultimately, the chapter situates this coverage within broader Enlightenment concerns with knowledge, identity, and transnational alignment, showing how disasters became key sites of meaning-making in eighteenth-century media.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
STURIALE_Fact_and_Ideology (1).pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
388.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
388.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




