The 2026 BCLC update incorporates recent therapeutic advances in HCC into its recommendations, while preserving simplicity. Each disease stage remains directly linked to its evidence-based first-line treatment option. The BCLC algorithm provides guidance for evaluating patient prognosis and proposes a therapeutic strategy according to the current scientific evidence. Tumour boards require structured methodologies to address clinical complexity. Beyond published evidence, decision-making should incorporate biological, psychosocial, and contextual factors that may affect morbidity, feasibility, and patient vulnerability. Such a multidimensional approach ensures treatments remain evidence-based and patient-centred. The updated clinical decision-making chapter embeds the CUSE (Complexity, Uncertainty, Subjectivity, Emotion) framework. CUSE turns unavoidable doubt into a shared, iterative process to: (i) define the therapeutic goal (survival, tumour control, quality of life, etc .); (ii) grade each option, noting evidence strength and gaps; (iii) align choices with comorbidities, feasibility, oncologic risk, and patient values and goals; and (iv) select a plan with regular check-ins as new information or needs arise.
BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: The 2026 update / M. Reig, M. Sanduzzi-Zamparelli, A. Forner, J. Rimola, J. Ferrer-Fàbrega, M. Burrel, Á. Garcia-Criado, A. Díaz, N. Llarch, G. Iserte, M. Mollà, R.K. Kelley, P.R. Galle, V. Mazzaferro, R. Salem, B. Sangro, A.G. Singal, A. Vogel, T.K. Yanagihara, C. Ayuso, F. Torres, J. Bruix. - In: JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 0168-8278. - 84:3(2026 Mar), pp. 631-654. [10.1016/j.jhep.2025.10.020]
BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: The 2026 update
V. Mazzaferro;
2026
Abstract
The 2026 BCLC update incorporates recent therapeutic advances in HCC into its recommendations, while preserving simplicity. Each disease stage remains directly linked to its evidence-based first-line treatment option. The BCLC algorithm provides guidance for evaluating patient prognosis and proposes a therapeutic strategy according to the current scientific evidence. Tumour boards require structured methodologies to address clinical complexity. Beyond published evidence, decision-making should incorporate biological, psychosocial, and contextual factors that may affect morbidity, feasibility, and patient vulnerability. Such a multidimensional approach ensures treatments remain evidence-based and patient-centred. The updated clinical decision-making chapter embeds the CUSE (Complexity, Uncertainty, Subjectivity, Emotion) framework. CUSE turns unavoidable doubt into a shared, iterative process to: (i) define the therapeutic goal (survival, tumour control, quality of life, etc .); (ii) grade each option, noting evidence strength and gaps; (iii) align choices with comorbidities, feasibility, oncologic risk, and patient values and goals; and (iv) select a plan with regular check-ins as new information or needs arise.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PIIS0168827825025711.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
2.87 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.87 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




