Forest restoration in Europe has a complex history strongly influenced by various social, policy and economic factors. Understanding these influences is essential for shaping effective restoration strategies and avoiding past mistakes, particularly in light of meeting ambitious targets outlined in initiatives such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Here we identify the key social, policy and economic drivers, barriers and enablers that have historically shaped forest restoration across Europe. We analyzed and synthesized detailed information from historical national narratives on forest restoration provided by experts from 18 European countries. Our work details how wars, changes in governance (centralization vs. decentralization) and forest tenure (privatization vs. nationalization), different policy instruments (regulatory, financial, persuasive and organizational), market fluctuations and sociodemographic changes (e.g., rural abandonment, changes in public opinion) have driven the development of forest restoration in Europe. The findings underscore the need to use inclusive and innovative governance mechanisms to reconcile diverging societal paradigms (e.g., rural vs. urban, conservation vs. forestry) partly reflected in incoherent forest-related policies, as well as to address the fragmentation resulting from forest privatization. Ensuring stable funding mechanisms (e.g., remuneration systems for forest ecosystem services) alongside favorable regulatory frameworks will also be key for successful large-scale forest restoration efforts. Policy recommendations are made to ensure the effective implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation, including a hybrid governance model that balances strong national regulatory frameworks with local adaptability to diverse socioecological contexts, integrating socioeconomic metrics, strengthening public engagement, and leveraging market-based and green tax incentives.
The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe / M. Erdozain, I. Alberdi, R. Aszalos, K. Bollmann, V. Detsis, J. Diaci, M. Dodan, G. Efthimiou, L. Galhidy, M. Haase, J. Hoffmann, D. Jaymond, E. Johann, H. Jorgensen, F. Krumm, T. Kuuluvainen, T. Lachat, K. Lapin, M. Lindner, P. Madsen, L. Nichiforel, M. Pach, Y. Paillet, C. Palaghianu, J. Palau, J. Peman, S. Peric, S. Raum, S. Schuler, J. Skrzyszewski, J. Svensson, S. Teeuwen, G. Vacchiano, K. Vandekerkhove, I. Canellas, M. Menendez-Miguelez, L. Warden, S. Fleckenstein, M. Sotirov, M. Kazungu, M. Hunziker, L. De Keersmaeker, A. Avila Callau, S. de-Miguel. - In: LAND USE POLICY. - ISSN 0264-8377. - 161:(2026), pp. 107876.1-107876.20. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107876]
The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe
M. Lindner;G. Vacchiano;
2026
Abstract
Forest restoration in Europe has a complex history strongly influenced by various social, policy and economic factors. Understanding these influences is essential for shaping effective restoration strategies and avoiding past mistakes, particularly in light of meeting ambitious targets outlined in initiatives such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Here we identify the key social, policy and economic drivers, barriers and enablers that have historically shaped forest restoration across Europe. We analyzed and synthesized detailed information from historical national narratives on forest restoration provided by experts from 18 European countries. Our work details how wars, changes in governance (centralization vs. decentralization) and forest tenure (privatization vs. nationalization), different policy instruments (regulatory, financial, persuasive and organizational), market fluctuations and sociodemographic changes (e.g., rural abandonment, changes in public opinion) have driven the development of forest restoration in Europe. The findings underscore the need to use inclusive and innovative governance mechanisms to reconcile diverging societal paradigms (e.g., rural vs. urban, conservation vs. forestry) partly reflected in incoherent forest-related policies, as well as to address the fragmentation resulting from forest privatization. Ensuring stable funding mechanisms (e.g., remuneration systems for forest ecosystem services) alongside favorable regulatory frameworks will also be key for successful large-scale forest restoration efforts. Policy recommendations are made to ensure the effective implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation, including a hybrid governance model that balances strong national regulatory frameworks with local adaptability to diverse socioecological contexts, integrating socioeconomic metrics, strengthening public engagement, and leveraging market-based and green tax incentives.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026 Erdozain.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
7.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




