I present a novel approach to modal imagination as a means of knowing metaphysical possibilities. Hume calls the link between imagining and possibility an ‘established maxim’. I ask: what makes it seem so natural to use imagination as a guide to modality? (1.) I draw some lessons on my motivational question from the current debate. (2.) I develop my answer: we use imagination to creatively simulate solutions to feasibility issues. (2.1.) To corroborate my answer, I consider everyday feasibility issues. (2.2.) I then extend the account to more remote feasibility issues. (2.3.) I point out a special connection between imagination and creativity (3.) I show how the feasibility approach bears on issues of metaphysical possibility. (3.1.) I outline how imagination allows to retrieve and test modal constraints. (3.2.) I support my argument by examples from the philosophical debate. (3.3.) I answer my original motivational question. (4.) I address objections.

The feasibility approach to imagination as a guide to metaphysical modality / D. Dohrn. - In: ARGUMENTA. - ISSN 2465-2334. - 10:19(2024), pp. 127-144. [10.14275/2465-2334/20240.doh]

The feasibility approach to imagination as a guide to metaphysical modality

D. Dohrn
2024

Abstract

I present a novel approach to modal imagination as a means of knowing metaphysical possibilities. Hume calls the link between imagining and possibility an ‘established maxim’. I ask: what makes it seem so natural to use imagination as a guide to modality? (1.) I draw some lessons on my motivational question from the current debate. (2.) I develop my answer: we use imagination to creatively simulate solutions to feasibility issues. (2.1.) To corroborate my answer, I consider everyday feasibility issues. (2.2.) I then extend the account to more remote feasibility issues. (2.3.) I point out a special connection between imagination and creativity (3.) I show how the feasibility approach bears on issues of metaphysical possibility. (3.1.) I outline how imagination allows to retrieve and test modal constraints. (3.2.) I support my argument by examples from the philosophical debate. (3.3.) I answer my original motivational question. (4.) I address objections.
Conceivability; Imagination; Modality; Possibility;
Settore PHIL-01/A - Filosofia teoretica
Settore PHIL-04/B - Filosofia e teoria dei linguaggi
2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7_Feasibility.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 372.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
372.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1220479
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact