Objective: To determine whether there is a higher rate of major fetal congenital heart diseases (CHDs) at first-trimester scan in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 2014 to 2022. It included 20,009 singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound between 11 and 15 weeks for first-trimester aneuploidy screening or referral for suspected fetal abnormality. Fetal heart assessment was performed through sequential analysis. In cases of CHDs, extracardiac malformations, or other risk factors for major aneuploidies, fetal karyotype evaluation was conducted. CHDs were categorized as major or minor. Results: A CHD was diagnosed in 133 (0.7%) of 18,532 natural pregnancies and 14 (0.9%) of 1477 ART pregnancies. The prevalence of major CHDs in natural pregnancies was 0.5%, with no significant difference compared to ART pregnancies (0.7%; p = 0.47). Overall, 48 CHD cases (43.2%) were associated with extracardiac abnormalities, with no differences between natural and ART pregnancies (p = 0.38). The frequency of abnormal karyotype and isolated CHDs (normal karyotype and no extracardiac abnormalities) also did not differ. Conclusion: The rate of major CHDs detectable at the end of the first trimester does not differ between ART and natural pregnancies.

Association Between Fetal Congenital Heart Disease and Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study / I.G. Ramezzana, M. Reschini, S. Boito, L. Mauri, A. Giri, E. Somigliana, N. Persico. - In: BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH. - ISSN 2472-1727. - 118:2(2026 Feb 03), pp. e70030.1-e70030.6. [10.1002/bdr2.70030]

Association Between Fetal Congenital Heart Disease and Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study

A. Giri;E. Somigliana
Penultimo
;
N. Persico
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there is a higher rate of major fetal congenital heart diseases (CHDs) at first-trimester scan in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 2014 to 2022. It included 20,009 singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound between 11 and 15 weeks for first-trimester aneuploidy screening or referral for suspected fetal abnormality. Fetal heart assessment was performed through sequential analysis. In cases of CHDs, extracardiac malformations, or other risk factors for major aneuploidies, fetal karyotype evaluation was conducted. CHDs were categorized as major or minor. Results: A CHD was diagnosed in 133 (0.7%) of 18,532 natural pregnancies and 14 (0.9%) of 1477 ART pregnancies. The prevalence of major CHDs in natural pregnancies was 0.5%, with no significant difference compared to ART pregnancies (0.7%; p = 0.47). Overall, 48 CHD cases (43.2%) were associated with extracardiac abnormalities, with no differences between natural and ART pregnancies (p = 0.38). The frequency of abnormal karyotype and isolated CHDs (normal karyotype and no extracardiac abnormalities) also did not differ. Conclusion: The rate of major CHDs detectable at the end of the first trimester does not differ between ART and natural pregnancies.
assisted reproductive technology; cardiac defects; first trimester; pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis;
Settore MEDS-21/A - Ginecologia e ostetricia
3-feb-2026
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026 Birth Defects Research - Ramezzana - Association Between Fetal Congenital Heart Disease and Assisted Reproductive.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 223.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
223.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1219922
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact