Introduction: As research highlights how climate change impacts individual and planetary health, people might consider reducing their ecological footprint by acting pro-environmentally. However, their choice might depend on how far along they are in the process of deciding to act pro-environmentally (i.e., different stages of decision making) and on their experienced difficulty in deciding in favour of the environment and which behaviour to conduct (i.e., decisional conflict). Methods: To explore in which stage participants find themselves (i.e., not yet thinking about choices, showing interest in doing so, actively considering options, approaching a decision, having already decided but remaining open to reconsideration, or being firmly committed to a decision with little chance of change) and whether their respective stages are correlated with their experienced decisional conflict, an online, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among a convenience sample of 418 English-, Dutch-, and Italian-speaking adults to measure participants’ demographics, stages, and extent to which they experience decisional conflict. Results: Based on regression analyses, we observed that participants who were further along in the stages experienced less decisional conflict. Conclusion: Therefore, we suggest that interventions (e.g., decision aids) take stages into account to better meet users’ needs and assist people in making environmental decisions.
Understanding environmental decision making: The association between stages of decision making and decisional conflict / L. Richelli, E.L.F.M.G. Vissers, A. Gorini, M.H.C. Meijers, E.S. Smit, T. Gültzow. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH. - ISSN 2667-2782. - 24:(2025), pp. 100467.1-100467.7. [10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100467]
Understanding environmental decision making: The association between stages of decision making and decisional conflict
A. Gorini;
2025
Abstract
Introduction: As research highlights how climate change impacts individual and planetary health, people might consider reducing their ecological footprint by acting pro-environmentally. However, their choice might depend on how far along they are in the process of deciding to act pro-environmentally (i.e., different stages of decision making) and on their experienced difficulty in deciding in favour of the environment and which behaviour to conduct (i.e., decisional conflict). Methods: To explore in which stage participants find themselves (i.e., not yet thinking about choices, showing interest in doing so, actively considering options, approaching a decision, having already decided but remaining open to reconsideration, or being firmly committed to a decision with little chance of change) and whether their respective stages are correlated with their experienced decisional conflict, an online, cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed among a convenience sample of 418 English-, Dutch-, and Italian-speaking adults to measure participants’ demographics, stages, and extent to which they experience decisional conflict. Results: Based on regression analyses, we observed that participants who were further along in the stages experienced less decisional conflict. Conclusion: Therefore, we suggest that interventions (e.g., decision aids) take stages into account to better meet users’ needs and assist people in making environmental decisions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025_Richelli et al..pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
810.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
810.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




