Background: Moral distress occurs when ethically appropriate actions cannot be implemented, resulting in cognitive and emotional strain linked to outcomes like burnout and staff turnover. Despite extensive cross-cultural validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), no Italian adaptation currently exists, limiting research in Italian contexts. Aim: To culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP-ITA) within two major Italian healthcare settings. Methods: An observational multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to September 2023. The original questionnaire underwent forward-backward translation. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses evaluated structural validity, and Cronbach’s alpha assessed internal consistency. Construct validity was tested by correlating scores with the Ethical Leadership Scale. Participants: A sample of 567 healthcare professionals (median age 43 years; 74% female; 74% nurses) was recruited and completed the Italian version of the questionnaire online. Ethical consideration: The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the two healthcare institutions involved. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Results: The Italian version demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor model explaining 58.6% of the variance, with dimensions reflecting: (1) System-level constraints, (2) Team-level dynamics, and (3) Patient/family-level conflicts. Convergent validity was confirmed via significant associations with related constructs: moral distress scores were higher among nurses, younger professionals, and those considering job departure, and negatively correlated with ethical leadership ratings (r = −0.375, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing moral distress among Italian healthcare professionals, effectively capturing the multidimensionality of the construct in a culturally relevant way.

Italian validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP): A multicenter cross-sectional study / A. Gorini, M. Parati, G. Viganó, F. Marchetti, L. Fiorentino, D. Marchetti, L. Fiaschi, G. Gualtieri, M. Casati, S. Cesa, A. Pozza. - In: NURSING ETHICS. - ISSN 0969-7330. - (2025). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/09697330251403135]

Italian validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP): A multicenter cross-sectional study

A. Gorini
Primo
;
2025

Abstract

Background: Moral distress occurs when ethically appropriate actions cannot be implemented, resulting in cognitive and emotional strain linked to outcomes like burnout and staff turnover. Despite extensive cross-cultural validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), no Italian adaptation currently exists, limiting research in Italian contexts. Aim: To culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP-ITA) within two major Italian healthcare settings. Methods: An observational multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to September 2023. The original questionnaire underwent forward-backward translation. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses evaluated structural validity, and Cronbach’s alpha assessed internal consistency. Construct validity was tested by correlating scores with the Ethical Leadership Scale. Participants: A sample of 567 healthcare professionals (median age 43 years; 74% female; 74% nurses) was recruited and completed the Italian version of the questionnaire online. Ethical consideration: The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the two healthcare institutions involved. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Results: The Italian version demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor model explaining 58.6% of the variance, with dimensions reflecting: (1) System-level constraints, (2) Team-level dynamics, and (3) Patient/family-level conflicts. Convergent validity was confirmed via significant associations with related constructs: moral distress scores were higher among nurses, younger professionals, and those considering job departure, and negatively correlated with ethical leadership ratings (r = −0.375, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing moral distress among Italian healthcare professionals, effectively capturing the multidimensionality of the construct in a culturally relevant way.
burnout; cross-cultural comparison; health personnel; moral distress; psychometrics; surveys and questionnaires
Settore PSIC-01/A - Psicologia generale
2025
dic-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025_Gorini-et-al_Italian-validation-of-the-measure-of-moral-distress-for-healthcare-professionals.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 864.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
864.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1212157
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact