Introduction: Outdoor running gait analysis using wearable sensors requires establishing minimum step requirements for reliable parameter measurement. Sources of data: Fourteen trained runners completed 10-minute trials at critical speed. RunScribe™ captured kinetic/kinematic data at 500 Hz. Convergence analysis determined minimum steps when cumulative means stabilized within ±2% for ≥10 consecutive steps. Areas of agreement: Most parameters achieved excellent reliability (ICC > 0.900). Metabolic parameters (V̇O₂: 108 ± 32 steps) and step rate (124 ± 36 steps) converged fastest, while kinematic variables required moderate sampling (stride length: 152 ± 48 steps; contact time: 198 ± 52 steps). Areas of controversy: Complex biomechanical metrics showed substantial variability: leg stiffness (kleg: 342 ± 78 steps; kvert: 298 ± 71 steps) and gait variability (246 ± 12 steps) required substantially more data, challenging brief field assessment feasibility. Growing points: This study establishes parameter-specific sampling protocols for outdoor gait analysis, demonstrating that different measurement domains require tailored data collection strategies to optimize ecological validity. Areas timely for developing research: Future research should examine how speed, terrain, and environmental conditions affect sampling requirements. Adaptive protocols and machine learning approaches offer promising opportunities for optimizing data collection efficiency.
Determining the minimum number of steps required for reliable kinetic, kinematic, gait variability, and V̇O2 parameters in outdoor running / J. Padulo, R. Scurati, S. Baldo, F. Esposito, L.A. Peyré-Tartaruga. - In: BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN. - ISSN 0007-1420. - 157:1(2026 Jan), pp. ldaf025.1-ldaf025.9. [10.1093/bmb/ldaf025]
Determining the minimum number of steps required for reliable kinetic, kinematic, gait variability, and V̇O2 parameters in outdoor running
J. Padulo
Primo
;R. Scurati;F. Esposito;
2026
Abstract
Introduction: Outdoor running gait analysis using wearable sensors requires establishing minimum step requirements for reliable parameter measurement. Sources of data: Fourteen trained runners completed 10-minute trials at critical speed. RunScribe™ captured kinetic/kinematic data at 500 Hz. Convergence analysis determined minimum steps when cumulative means stabilized within ±2% for ≥10 consecutive steps. Areas of agreement: Most parameters achieved excellent reliability (ICC > 0.900). Metabolic parameters (V̇O₂: 108 ± 32 steps) and step rate (124 ± 36 steps) converged fastest, while kinematic variables required moderate sampling (stride length: 152 ± 48 steps; contact time: 198 ± 52 steps). Areas of controversy: Complex biomechanical metrics showed substantial variability: leg stiffness (kleg: 342 ± 78 steps; kvert: 298 ± 71 steps) and gait variability (246 ± 12 steps) required substantially more data, challenging brief field assessment feasibility. Growing points: This study establishes parameter-specific sampling protocols for outdoor gait analysis, demonstrating that different measurement domains require tailored data collection strategies to optimize ecological validity. Areas timely for developing research: Future research should examine how speed, terrain, and environmental conditions affect sampling requirements. Adaptive protocols and machine learning approaches offer promising opportunities for optimizing data collection efficiency.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Padulo BMB 2026 Determining the minimum number of steps required for reliable kinetic, kinematic, gait variability, and V̇O2 parameters in outdoor running.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
713.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
713.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




