Total knee replacement (TKR) is a safe treatment for alleviating pain and restoring physical function in end-stage arthropathy of the knee. First reports of TKR in haemophiliacs date back to the mid-1970s, however detailed information on long-term outcome is scarce. This study evaluated factors influencing the outcome of 116 primary TKRs performed consecutively over 14 years at a single institution. Haemostatic management is discussed in patients with and without inhibitors. Orthopaedic outcome was measured by using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee-rating scale, knee flexion contracture and range of motion. At the end of follow-up period (median duration: 5.1 years) 96 prostheses (83%) were still in place with a 7-year removal-free survival of 81%, similar between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and -negative patients and lower in inhibitor than non-inhibitor patients (44% vs. 87%; P < 0.05). Sixteen prostheses (14%) were removed for infection (nine) or aseptic loosening (seven) after a median of 4.5 years. Presence of inhibitors, continuous infusion, cementless prostheses and different primary surgeons were associated with an increased risk of infection; however, after adjustment, only primary surgeon was confirmed as an independent risk factor. These results show that TKR represents a safe and effective procedure in haemophiliacs if performed by a highly experienced surgeon.

Factors influencing the long-term outcome of primary total knee replacement in haemophiliacs: a review of 116 procedures at a single institution / L. Solimeno, M. Mancuso, G. Pasta, E. Santagostino, S. Perfetto, P. Mannucci. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1048. - 145:2(2009 Apr), pp. 227-234. [10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07613.x.]

Factors influencing the long-term outcome of primary total knee replacement in haemophiliacs: a review of 116 procedures at a single institution

L. Solimeno
Primo
;
2009

Abstract

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a safe treatment for alleviating pain and restoring physical function in end-stage arthropathy of the knee. First reports of TKR in haemophiliacs date back to the mid-1970s, however detailed information on long-term outcome is scarce. This study evaluated factors influencing the outcome of 116 primary TKRs performed consecutively over 14 years at a single institution. Haemostatic management is discussed in patients with and without inhibitors. Orthopaedic outcome was measured by using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee-rating scale, knee flexion contracture and range of motion. At the end of follow-up period (median duration: 5.1 years) 96 prostheses (83%) were still in place with a 7-year removal-free survival of 81%, similar between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and -negative patients and lower in inhibitor than non-inhibitor patients (44% vs. 87%; P < 0.05). Sixteen prostheses (14%) were removed for infection (nine) or aseptic loosening (seven) after a median of 4.5 years. Presence of inhibitors, continuous infusion, cementless prostheses and different primary surgeons were associated with an increased risk of infection; however, after adjustment, only primary surgeon was confirmed as an independent risk factor. These results show that TKR represents a safe and effective procedure in haemophiliacs if performed by a highly experienced surgeon.
Haemophilia; Infection; Inhibitors; Surgery; Total knee replacement;
Settore MEDS-19/B - Medicina fisica e riabilitativa
apr-2009
26-mar-2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
british journal of haematology vol 145 pag 227-234.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 125.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1208956
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 100
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 88
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact