Background The benefit of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear.Methods We conducted a meta-analysis at the individual-patient level using data from five open-label trials that randomly assigned patients with recent myocardial infarction, no other indications for beta-blocker therapy, and an LVEF of at least 50% to receive beta-blocker therapy or no beta-blocker therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Event rates were analyzed with a one-stage fixed-effects Cox proportional-hazards model.Results A total of 17,801 patients were included from the REBOOT (7459 patients), REDUCE-AMI (4967 patients), BETAMI (2441 patients), DANBLOCK (2277 patients), and CAPITAL-RCT (657 patients) trials. Of these 17,801 patients, 8831 (49.6%) were assigned to receive a beta-blocker and 8970 (50.4%) were assigned to receive no beta-blocker. During a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.3 to 4.6), a primary-end-point event occurred in 717 patients (8.1%) in the beta-blocker group and 748 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.07; P=0.54). Death from any cause occurred in 335 patients in the beta-blocker group and 326 patients in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.21); myocardial infarction occurred in 360 and 407 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.03); and heart failure occurred in 75 and 87 patients (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19).Conclusions In this meta-analysis including individual-patient data from five randomized trials, beta-blocker therapy did not reduce the incidence of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or heart failure in patients with an LVEF of at least 50% after myocardial infarction without other indications for beta-blockers. (Funded by Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and others; PROSPERO database number, CRD420251119176.)In a meta-analysis of 17,801 patients with myocardial infarction and preserved LVEF (>= 50%), beta-blockers did not reduce death, MI, or heart failure over a median 3.6 years of follow-up.
Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction with Normal Ejection Fraction / A.M.D. Kristensen, X. Rossello, D. Atar, T. Yndigegn, T. Kimura, R. Latini, B. Lindahl, S. Halvorsen, M.H. Olsen, V. Fuster, R. Hofmann, K. Vikenes, M. Maeng, D. Erlinge, S. Pocock, P. Karlström, A. Bakken, T. Lange, J.A. Barrabés, J. Benatar, S. Raposeiras-Roubin, C. Held, M. Piepoli, M.W. Fagerland, T. Holmager, N. Ozasa, E.I.B. Prescott, J. Munkhaugen, T. Jernberg, B. Ibanez. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - (2025), pp. 1-11. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1056/nejmoa2512686]
Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction with Normal Ejection Fraction
M. Piepoli;
2025
Abstract
Background The benefit of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear.Methods We conducted a meta-analysis at the individual-patient level using data from five open-label trials that randomly assigned patients with recent myocardial infarction, no other indications for beta-blocker therapy, and an LVEF of at least 50% to receive beta-blocker therapy or no beta-blocker therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Event rates were analyzed with a one-stage fixed-effects Cox proportional-hazards model.Results A total of 17,801 patients were included from the REBOOT (7459 patients), REDUCE-AMI (4967 patients), BETAMI (2441 patients), DANBLOCK (2277 patients), and CAPITAL-RCT (657 patients) trials. Of these 17,801 patients, 8831 (49.6%) were assigned to receive a beta-blocker and 8970 (50.4%) were assigned to receive no beta-blocker. During a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.3 to 4.6), a primary-end-point event occurred in 717 patients (8.1%) in the beta-blocker group and 748 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.07; P=0.54). Death from any cause occurred in 335 patients in the beta-blocker group and 326 patients in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.21); myocardial infarction occurred in 360 and 407 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.03); and heart failure occurred in 75 and 87 patients (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19).Conclusions In this meta-analysis including individual-patient data from five randomized trials, beta-blocker therapy did not reduce the incidence of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or heart failure in patients with an LVEF of at least 50% after myocardial infarction without other indications for beta-blockers. (Funded by Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III and others; PROSPERO database number, CRD420251119176.)In a meta-analysis of 17,801 patients with myocardial infarction and preserved LVEF (>= 50%), beta-blockers did not reduce death, MI, or heart failure over a median 3.6 years of follow-up.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kristensen_NEJMoa2512686.pdf
accesso riservato
Descrizione: online first
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
665.85 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
665.85 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




