OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes of Robot-assisted (RATS) thymectomy in the treatment of large (diameter >5 cm) thymomas. METHODS Clinical data of 318 thymectomies for thymoma [117 (36.8%) for concomitant Myasthenia Gravis (MG)], performed in 7 high volume centers from 2010 to 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were evaluated: 1.in the RATS group per thymoma size (<5 vs >5 cm); 2.in large thymomas per surgical approach (RATS vs open/RATS vs VATS). KaplanMeier and Cox-regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for oncological outcomes. To reduce any selection bias, a 1:1 propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed for large thymomas. RESULTS 132 RATS thymectomies were performed: 59 (44.7%) for small [MG: 34 (57.6%)] and 73 (55.3%) for large [MG: 22 (30.1%)] thymomas. Conversion (p=0.48), significant complications (p=0.26) and hospital stay (p=0.79) were similar in both groups. Overall, 208 large thymomas were operated on: 73 (35.1%) RATS [MG: 22 (30.1%)], 118 (56.7%) open [MG: 38 (32.2%)] and 17 (8.2%) VATS (MG: 0%). More post-operative complications (p<0.001) but similar major complications (p=0.11) and a longer in-hospital stay (p<0.001) were recorded in an open group compared to RATS for large thymomas without differences in the MG population (p=0.77). While comparing RATS to the VATS group (with a significant difference in MG between groups, p<0.001), no difference was recorded in conversion (p=0.52), complications (p=0.75) and hospitalization (p=0.08). Five-year OS (95% vs 85%, p=0.14) and DFS (86% vs 93%, p=0.18) of large thymomas were comparable between RATS and the open group. Prognostic factors for oncological outcomes for large thymomas were confirmed after PSM. Adjuvant radiotherapy was the only prognostic factor (HR=6.11, 95%CI:1.27-29.40, p=0.02) affecting DFI, while no factor was confirmed for OS at multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS RATS is a safe and effective approach for treating large thymomas.

ROBOT-ASSISTED THYMECTOMY FOR LARGE THYMOMAS: SURGICAL AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY / D. Nachira, E. Meacci, L. Bertolaccini, P. Novellis, P. Bertoglio, A. De Palma, R. Romano, F. Raveglia, M. Chiappetta, M. Chiari, S. Maiorca, C. Scala, M. Petroncini, D. Brascia, G. Carleo, F. Spinelli, F. Petrella, D. Gavezzoli, P. Solli, G. Veronesi, L. Spaggiari, S. Margaritora. 32. ESTS Annual Meeting : 26-28 may Barcelona 2024.

ROBOT-ASSISTED THYMECTOMY FOR LARGE THYMOMAS: SURGICAL AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY

L. Bertolaccini;F. Raveglia;M. Chiari;S. Maiorca;F. Spinelli;F. Petrella;L. Spaggiari;
2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes of Robot-assisted (RATS) thymectomy in the treatment of large (diameter >5 cm) thymomas. METHODS Clinical data of 318 thymectomies for thymoma [117 (36.8%) for concomitant Myasthenia Gravis (MG)], performed in 7 high volume centers from 2010 to 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were evaluated: 1.in the RATS group per thymoma size (<5 vs >5 cm); 2.in large thymomas per surgical approach (RATS vs open/RATS vs VATS). KaplanMeier and Cox-regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for oncological outcomes. To reduce any selection bias, a 1:1 propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed for large thymomas. RESULTS 132 RATS thymectomies were performed: 59 (44.7%) for small [MG: 34 (57.6%)] and 73 (55.3%) for large [MG: 22 (30.1%)] thymomas. Conversion (p=0.48), significant complications (p=0.26) and hospital stay (p=0.79) were similar in both groups. Overall, 208 large thymomas were operated on: 73 (35.1%) RATS [MG: 22 (30.1%)], 118 (56.7%) open [MG: 38 (32.2%)] and 17 (8.2%) VATS (MG: 0%). More post-operative complications (p<0.001) but similar major complications (p=0.11) and a longer in-hospital stay (p<0.001) were recorded in an open group compared to RATS for large thymomas without differences in the MG population (p=0.77). While comparing RATS to the VATS group (with a significant difference in MG between groups, p<0.001), no difference was recorded in conversion (p=0.52), complications (p=0.75) and hospitalization (p=0.08). Five-year OS (95% vs 85%, p=0.14) and DFS (86% vs 93%, p=0.18) of large thymomas were comparable between RATS and the open group. Prognostic factors for oncological outcomes for large thymomas were confirmed after PSM. Adjuvant radiotherapy was the only prognostic factor (HR=6.11, 95%CI:1.27-29.40, p=0.02) affecting DFI, while no factor was confirmed for OS at multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS RATS is a safe and effective approach for treating large thymomas.
No
English
28-mag-2024
Settore MEDS-13/A - Chirurgia toracica
Poster
Intervento inviato
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
ESTS Annual Meeting : 26-28 may
Barcelona
2024
32
Convegno internazionale
manual
D. Nachira, E. Meacci, L. Bertolaccini, P. Novellis, P. Bertoglio, A. De Palma, R. Romano, F. Raveglia, M. Chiappetta, M. Chiari, S. Maiorca, C. Scala...espandi
ROBOT-ASSISTED THYMECTOMY FOR LARGE THYMOMAS: SURGICAL AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY / D. Nachira, E. Meacci, L. Bertolaccini, P. Novellis, P. Bertoglio, A. De Palma, R. Romano, F. Raveglia, M. Chiappetta, M. Chiari, S. Maiorca, C. Scala, M. Petroncini, D. Brascia, G. Carleo, F. Spinelli, F. Petrella, D. Gavezzoli, P. Solli, G. Veronesi, L. Spaggiari, S. Margaritora. 32. ESTS Annual Meeting : 26-28 may Barcelona 2024.
Prodotti della ricerca::14 - Intervento a convegno non pubblicato
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
open
Conference Object
22
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Book_of_Abstracts_ESTS2024_0705.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 23.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
23.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1207475
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact