Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) of stabilized soils is commonly used for evaluating the effectiveness of soil improvement techniques. Achieving target UCS values through conventional trial-and-error approaches requires extensive laboratory experiments, which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) frameworks offer a promising alternative by enabling automated, reproducible, and accessible predictive modeling of UCS values from more readily obtainable index and physical soil and stabilizer properties, reducing the reliance on experimental testing and empirical relationships, and allowing systematic exploration of multiple models and configurations. This study evaluates the predictive performance of five state-of-the-art AutoML frameworks (i.e., AutoGluon, AutoKeras, FLAML, H2O, and TPOT) using analyses of results from 10 experimental datasets comprising 2083 samples from laboratory experiments spanning diverse soil types, stabilizers, and experimental conditions across many countries worldwide. Comparative analyses revealed that FLAML achieved the highest overall performance (average PI score of 0.7848), whereas AutoKeras exhibited lower accuracy on complex datasets; AutoGluon , H2O and TPOT also demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, with performance varying with dataset characteristics. Despite the promising potential of AutoML, prior research has shown that fully automated frameworks have limited applicability to UCS prediction, highlighting a gap in end-to-end pipeline automation. The findings provide practical guidance for selecting AutoML tools based on dataset characteristics and research objectives, and suggest avenues for future studies, including expanding the range of AutoML frameworks and integrating interpretability techniques, such as feature importance analysis, to deepen understanding of soil–stabilizer interactions. Overall, the results indicate that AutoML frameworks can effectively accelerate UCS prediction, reduce laboratory workload, and support data-driven decision-making in geotechnical engineering.

AutoML-Based Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Stabilized Soils: A Multi-Dataset Evaluation on Worldwide Experimental Data / R.M. Oliveira, D. Campos, K.V. Bicalho, B.D.S. Macêdo, M. Bodini, C.M. Saporetti, L. Goliatt. - In: FORECASTING. - ISSN 2571-9394. - 7:4(2025 Dec), pp. 80.1-80.48. [10.3390/forecast7040080]

AutoML-Based Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Stabilized Soils: A Multi-Dataset Evaluation on Worldwide Experimental Data

M. Bodini
;
2025

Abstract

Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) of stabilized soils is commonly used for evaluating the effectiveness of soil improvement techniques. Achieving target UCS values through conventional trial-and-error approaches requires extensive laboratory experiments, which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) frameworks offer a promising alternative by enabling automated, reproducible, and accessible predictive modeling of UCS values from more readily obtainable index and physical soil and stabilizer properties, reducing the reliance on experimental testing and empirical relationships, and allowing systematic exploration of multiple models and configurations. This study evaluates the predictive performance of five state-of-the-art AutoML frameworks (i.e., AutoGluon, AutoKeras, FLAML, H2O, and TPOT) using analyses of results from 10 experimental datasets comprising 2083 samples from laboratory experiments spanning diverse soil types, stabilizers, and experimental conditions across many countries worldwide. Comparative analyses revealed that FLAML achieved the highest overall performance (average PI score of 0.7848), whereas AutoKeras exhibited lower accuracy on complex datasets; AutoGluon , H2O and TPOT also demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, with performance varying with dataset characteristics. Despite the promising potential of AutoML, prior research has shown that fully automated frameworks have limited applicability to UCS prediction, highlighting a gap in end-to-end pipeline automation. The findings provide practical guidance for selecting AutoML tools based on dataset characteristics and research objectives, and suggest avenues for future studies, including expanding the range of AutoML frameworks and integrating interpretability techniques, such as feature importance analysis, to deepen understanding of soil–stabilizer interactions. Overall, the results indicate that AutoML frameworks can effectively accelerate UCS prediction, reduce laboratory workload, and support data-driven decision-making in geotechnical engineering.
unconfined compressive strength; automated machine learning; soil stabilization; multi-dataset evaluation; predictive modeling; soil–stabilizer optimization
Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica
Settore IINF-05/A - Sistemi di elaborazione delle informazioni
Settore GEOS-03/B - Geologia applicata
dic-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
forecasting-07-00080-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Versione disponibile online
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1206063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex 1
social impact