Is democratic governance a key driver of environmental policy in the agricultural sector? We address this question using a global dataset covering national-level agri-environmental policies and regime transitions between autocracy and democracy from 1961 to 2021. Our empirical strategy employs a difference-in-differences estimator within an event-study framework to identify the causal impact of democratization on the adoption of agri-environmental policy measures. The results show that democratic transitions lead to a significant increase in the adoption of such policies. In the short to medium run (within six years), democratization causes a +25% increase in the number of agri-environmental policies compared to a counterfactual scenario under autocracy. In the long run, this effect persists and is likely to grow further. These newly implemented policies predominantly address biodiversity protection, fertilizer use, forest conservation, and soil erosion. We find no systematic evidence of heterogeneous effects among democracies based on characteristics such as government type, electoral system, levels of political corruption, or international integration. The relevance of these findings is heightened by current global political developments, as many democracies are experiencing institutional backsliding. Future research should directly examine how such developments influence the adoption of environmental policies.

Democratization drives the adoption of national agri-environmental policies / P. Nota, D. Curzi, A. Olper. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS. - ISSN 1748-9326. - 20:12(2025 Dec 01), pp. 124028.1-124028.11. [10.1088/1748-9326/ae1e14]

Democratization drives the adoption of national agri-environmental policies

P. Nota
Primo
;
D. Curzi
Secondo
;
A. Olper
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Is democratic governance a key driver of environmental policy in the agricultural sector? We address this question using a global dataset covering national-level agri-environmental policies and regime transitions between autocracy and democracy from 1961 to 2021. Our empirical strategy employs a difference-in-differences estimator within an event-study framework to identify the causal impact of democratization on the adoption of agri-environmental policy measures. The results show that democratic transitions lead to a significant increase in the adoption of such policies. In the short to medium run (within six years), democratization causes a +25% increase in the number of agri-environmental policies compared to a counterfactual scenario under autocracy. In the long run, this effect persists and is likely to grow further. These newly implemented policies predominantly address biodiversity protection, fertilizer use, forest conservation, and soil erosion. We find no systematic evidence of heterogeneous effects among democracies based on characteristics such as government type, electoral system, levels of political corruption, or international integration. The relevance of these findings is heightened by current global political developments, as many democracies are experiencing institutional backsliding. Future research should directly examine how such developments influence the adoption of environmental policies.
democracy, environmental policy, agricultural policy, difference-in-differences;
Settore AGRI-01/A - Economia agraria, alimentare ed estimo rurale
Settore ECON-01/A - Economia politica
1-dic-2025
24-nov-2025
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ae1e14
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Nota_2025_Environ._Res._Lett._20_124028.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 971.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
971.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1203688
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact