Gastrointestinal cancer and occupational diesel exhaust exposure: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Background: Diesel exhaust exposure and cancer other than the lungs have been limitedly investigated. Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Two researchers performed a systematic literature review to identify all cohort studies on occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and risk of cancers other than lung. Of the 30 retained studies, 10 reported risk estimates for oesophageal, 18 on gastric, 15 on colon and 14 on rectal cancer. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ever-exposure to diesel exhaust. Results: We calculated summary RR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.97–1.21, P heterogeneity = 0.06) for oesophageal, 1.06 (95% CI 0.99–1.14, P < 0.001) for gastric, 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–1.00, P = 0.453) for colon, and RR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.97–1.11, P = 0.013) for rectal cancer. Drivers showed an association with oesophageal (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.99–1.62), gastric (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.91–1.59) and rectal cancer (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.13–1.75); machine operators with oesophageal (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00–1.20) and gastric (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10–1.20) and handlers with oesophageal cancer (RR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.23–3.09). Studies from Europe revealed an association with gastric cancer while those from North America did not (P < 0.05). No difference was found by quality score except for gastric cancer, where high-quality studies but not low-quality ones showed increased risk (P heterogeneity = 0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: An increased but insignificant risk of oesophageal, gastric and rectal, but not colon cancer, was suggested in workers exposed to diesel exhaust. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Two researchers performed a systematic literature review to identify all cohort studies on occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and risk of cancers other than lung. Of the 30 retained studies, 10 reported risk estimates for oesophageal, 18 on gastric, 15 on colon and 14 on rectal cancer. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ever-exposure to diesel exhaust. Results: We calculated summary RR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.97-1.21, P heterogeneity = 0.06) for oesophageal, 1.06 (95% CI 0.99-1.14, P < 0.001) for gastric, 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.00, P = 0.453) for colon, and RR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11, P = 0.013) for rectal cancer. Drivers showed an association with oesophageal (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.62), gastric (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.91-1.59) and rectal cancer (RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.75); machine operators with oesophageal (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20) and gastric (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.20) and handlers with oesophageal cancer (RR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.23-3.09). Studies from Europe revealed an association with gastric cancer while those from North America did not (P < 0.05). No difference was found by quality score except for gastric cancer, where high-quality studies but not low-quality ones showed increased risk (P heterogeneity = 0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: An increased but insignificant risk of oesophageal, gastric and rectal, but not colon cancer, was suggested in workers exposed to diesel exhaust. Residual confounding cannot be excluded.