Scandals have shown that extant assessment methods (e.g., certifications) cannot cater to the impermanent nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems because of their inherent learning capabilities and adaptability. Current AI assessment methods are only limitedly trustworthy and cannot fulfill their purpose of demonstrating system safety. Our interviews with AI experts from industry and academia help us understand why and how AI impermanence limits assessment in practice. We reveal eight AI impermanence-related implications that threaten the reliability of AI assessment, including challenges for assessment methods, the validity of assessment results, and AI's self-learning nature that requires ongoing reassessments. Our study contributes to a critical reflection on current AI assessment ideas, illustrating where their validity is at risk owing to AI impermanence. We provide the foundation for the development of assessment methods that consider impermanence-related implications and are suited to fully leveraging AI capabilities for the benefit of society.
AI Impermanence: Achilles’ Heel for AI Assessment? / K. Brecker, S. Lins, N. Bena, C.A. Ardagna, M. Anisetti, A. Sunyaev. - In: IEEE ACCESS. - ISSN 2169-3536. - 13:(2025 Nov 10), pp. 194435-194455. [10.1109/access.2025.3631309]
AI Impermanence: Achilles’ Heel for AI Assessment?
N. Bena;C.A. Ardagna;M. AnisettiPenultimo
;
2025
Abstract
Scandals have shown that extant assessment methods (e.g., certifications) cannot cater to the impermanent nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems because of their inherent learning capabilities and adaptability. Current AI assessment methods are only limitedly trustworthy and cannot fulfill their purpose of demonstrating system safety. Our interviews with AI experts from industry and academia help us understand why and how AI impermanence limits assessment in practice. We reveal eight AI impermanence-related implications that threaten the reliability of AI assessment, including challenges for assessment methods, the validity of assessment results, and AI's self-learning nature that requires ongoing reassessments. Our study contributes to a critical reflection on current AI assessment ideas, illustrating where their validity is at risk owing to AI impermanence. We provide the foundation for the development of assessment methods that consider impermanence-related implications and are suited to fully leveraging AI capabilities for the benefit of society.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BLBAAS.ACCESS2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




