Scandals have shown that extant assessment methods (e.g., certifications) cannot cater to the impermanent nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems because of their inherent learning capabilities and adaptability. Current AI assessment methods are only limitedly trustworthy and cannot fulfill their purpose of demonstrating system safety. Our interviews with AI experts from industry and academia help us understand why and how AI impermanence limits assessment in practice. We reveal eight AI impermanence-related implications that threaten the reliability of AI assessment, including challenges for assessment methods, the validity of assessment results, and AI's self-learning nature that requires ongoing reassessments. Our study contributes to a critical reflection on current AI assessment ideas, illustrating where their validity is at risk owing to AI impermanence. We provide the foundation for the development of assessment methods that consider impermanence-related implications and are suited to fully leveraging AI capabilities for the benefit of society.

AI Impermanence: Achilles’ Heel for AI Assessment? / K. Brecker, S. Lins, N. Bena, C.A. Ardagna, M. Anisetti, A. Sunyaev. - In: IEEE ACCESS. - ISSN 2169-3536. - 13:(2025 Nov 10), pp. 194435-194455. [10.1109/access.2025.3631309]

AI Impermanence: Achilles’ Heel for AI Assessment?

N. Bena;C.A. Ardagna;M. Anisetti
Penultimo
;
2025

Abstract

Scandals have shown that extant assessment methods (e.g., certifications) cannot cater to the impermanent nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems because of their inherent learning capabilities and adaptability. Current AI assessment methods are only limitedly trustworthy and cannot fulfill their purpose of demonstrating system safety. Our interviews with AI experts from industry and academia help us understand why and how AI impermanence limits assessment in practice. We reveal eight AI impermanence-related implications that threaten the reliability of AI assessment, including challenges for assessment methods, the validity of assessment results, and AI's self-learning nature that requires ongoing reassessments. Our study contributes to a critical reflection on current AI assessment ideas, illustrating where their validity is at risk owing to AI impermanence. We provide the foundation for the development of assessment methods that consider impermanence-related implications and are suited to fully leveraging AI capabilities for the benefit of society.
Artificial Intelligence; Artificial Intelligence Systems; Assessment; Changes; Impermanence; Learning;
Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica
10-nov-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BLBAAS.ACCESS2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1198459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact