The article examines the automation of the Refugee Status Determination Process (RSDP) in the European Union as a paradigmatic field where the tension between law, technology, and human rights becomes most evident. Drawing on recent EU reforms, including the 2024 Migration and Asylum Pact and the AI Act, it analyses how digital infrastructures, predictive models, and algorithmic decision-making challenge the principles of individual assessment, transparency, and proportionality. By combining legal, theoretical, and empirical perspectives, the paper explores the ontological transformation of asylum law from interpretative judgment to computational output, questioning the implications for discretion, accountability, and the recognition of human dignity. It concludes by outlining the need for a “post-algorithmic” asylum law that reaffirms human oversight, epistemic literacy, and the ethical centrality of the applicant’s narrative.

Automating Refugee Status Determination process : Il diritto d’asilo a confronto con l’intelligenza artificiale / M. Buffa. - In: DIRITTO ARTIFICIALE. - ISSN 3103-4128. - (2025). [Epub ahead of print]

Automating Refugee Status Determination process : Il diritto d’asilo a confronto con l’intelligenza artificiale

M. Buffa
2025

Abstract

The article examines the automation of the Refugee Status Determination Process (RSDP) in the European Union as a paradigmatic field where the tension between law, technology, and human rights becomes most evident. Drawing on recent EU reforms, including the 2024 Migration and Asylum Pact and the AI Act, it analyses how digital infrastructures, predictive models, and algorithmic decision-making challenge the principles of individual assessment, transparency, and proportionality. By combining legal, theoretical, and empirical perspectives, the paper explores the ontological transformation of asylum law from interpretative judgment to computational output, questioning the implications for discretion, accountability, and the recognition of human dignity. It concludes by outlining the need for a “post-algorithmic” asylum law that reaffirms human oversight, epistemic literacy, and the ethical centrality of the applicant’s narrative.
Artificial intelligence; Refugee Status Determination; Algorithmic governance; Accountability; Automation
Settore GIUR-17/A - Filosofia del diritto
Settore GSPS-07/B - Sociologia del diritto e della devianza
   SEcurity and RIghts in the CyberSpace (SERICS)
   SERICS
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   codice identificativo PE00000014
2025
4-dic-2025
https://www.dirittoartificiale.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/DA_2025_2_Buffa_of-2.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DA_2025_2_Buffa_of-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 311.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
311.6 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1194219
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact