Background and Objectives: Adequate buccal bone thickness is critical for long-term peri-implant health and stability. When residual alveolar bone volume is insufficient, guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely adopted technique. While non-resorbable membranes provide structural support, they carry a higher risk of complications and require secondary surgery. Resorbable collagen membranes, offer promising biological properties and easier clinical handling, yet clinical data remain limited. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of horizontal GBR using a native, non–cross-linked resorbable porcine pericardium membrane fixed with titanium pins, in conjunction with simultaneous implant placement. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (26 implants) with horizontal alveolar defects (<6 mm) underwent implant placement and GBR with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine pericardium collagen membrane. Horizontal bone gain and buccal bone thickness were measured at baseline and 6 months post-operatively. Post-operative complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and peri-implant tissue health were assessed up to 1 year post-loading. Results: Mean bone gain was 2.95 ± 0.95 mm, and all sites achieved a buccal bone thickness ≥ 1.5 mm. No membrane-related complications occurred. PROMs revealed low morbidity. At 1-year follow-up, marginal bone loss averaged 0.54 ± 0.7 mm, mean probing depth was 2.79 ± 0.78 mm, 92% of sites exhibited keratinized mucosa ≥ 2 mm. Conclusions: Native resorbable porcine pericardium membranes, when combined with DBBM and mechanical stabilization, seem to be effective for horizontal bone regeneration.
Horizontal Bone Augmentation with Natural Collagen Porcine Pericardium Membranes: A Prospective Cohort Study / P.P. Poli, L. Giboli, M. Manfredini, S. Khijmatgar, F.A. Souza, C. Maiorana. - In: MEDICINA. - ISSN 1010-660X. - 61:10(2025), pp. 1814.1-1814.17. [10.3390/medicina61101814]
Horizontal Bone Augmentation with Natural Collagen Porcine Pericardium Membranes: A Prospective Cohort Study
P.P. Poli
Primo
;L. GiboliSecondo
;M. Manfredini;S. Khijmatgar;C. MaioranaUltimo
2025
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Adequate buccal bone thickness is critical for long-term peri-implant health and stability. When residual alveolar bone volume is insufficient, guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely adopted technique. While non-resorbable membranes provide structural support, they carry a higher risk of complications and require secondary surgery. Resorbable collagen membranes, offer promising biological properties and easier clinical handling, yet clinical data remain limited. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of horizontal GBR using a native, non–cross-linked resorbable porcine pericardium membrane fixed with titanium pins, in conjunction with simultaneous implant placement. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (26 implants) with horizontal alveolar defects (<6 mm) underwent implant placement and GBR with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine pericardium collagen membrane. Horizontal bone gain and buccal bone thickness were measured at baseline and 6 months post-operatively. Post-operative complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and peri-implant tissue health were assessed up to 1 year post-loading. Results: Mean bone gain was 2.95 ± 0.95 mm, and all sites achieved a buccal bone thickness ≥ 1.5 mm. No membrane-related complications occurred. PROMs revealed low morbidity. At 1-year follow-up, marginal bone loss averaged 0.54 ± 0.7 mm, mean probing depth was 2.79 ± 0.78 mm, 92% of sites exhibited keratinized mucosa ≥ 2 mm. Conclusions: Native resorbable porcine pericardium membranes, when combined with DBBM and mechanical stabilization, seem to be effective for horizontal bone regeneration.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
medicina-61-01814.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
6.55 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.55 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




