Debates about neonatal imitation remain more open than Keven & Akins (K&A) imply. K&A do not recognize the primacy of the question concerning differential imitation and the links between experimental designs and more or less plausible theoretical assumptions. Moreover, they do not acknowledge previous theorizing on spontaneous behavior, the explanatory power of entrainment, and subtle connections with social cognition.
An unsettled debate: Key empirical and theoretical questions are still open / S. Vincini, Y. Jhang, E.H. Buder, S. Gallagher. - In: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 0140-525X. - 40:(2017), pp. 37-38. [10.1017/s0140525x16001977]
An unsettled debate: Key empirical and theoretical questions are still open
S. Vincini
Primo
;
2017
Abstract
Debates about neonatal imitation remain more open than Keven & Akins (K&A) imply. K&A do not recognize the primacy of the question concerning differential imitation and the links between experimental designs and more or less plausible theoretical assumptions. Moreover, they do not acknowledge previous theorizing on spontaneous behavior, the explanatory power of entrainment, and subtle connections with social cognition.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




