Background: Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Intracranial Electrical Stimulation (IES) are widely used to probe cortical excitability and connectivity, but their electrophysiological effects have never been compared. Objective: This study aims to fill this gap by using high-density scalp electroencephalogram (hd-EEG) as a common read-out to compare human brain responses to TMS and IES. Methods: The dataset includes TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) acquired from healthy subjects (n = 22) and IES-evoked potentials (IEPs) recorded from drug-resistant epileptic patients (n = 31) during wakefulness. In a subset of subjects TEPs (n = 12) and IEPs (n = 13) were also recorded during NREM sleep. Amplitude, spectral, and spatiotemporal features of TMS and IES responses, as well as their estimated electrical fields, were compared. Results: We observed marked differences between TMS and IES responses. During wakefulness, IEPs are considerably larger, slower and associated with a suppression of cortical activity, whereas TEPs are characterized by multiple waves of recurrent activation. These differences are attenuated in NREM, during which both TMS and IES elicit large EEG responses associated with a prominent suppression of cortical activity. At the global level, the spatiotemporal complexity of the responses to both TMS and IES decreases consistently following the transition from wakefulness to NREM sleep. Conclusion: Despite the limitations due to different subject populations (healthy vs pathological), our findings provide a first reference to parallel non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation and to interpret their differential effects. They also offer important insight on how cortical responsiveness is shaped by inhibition and adaptation mechanisms depending on input parameters and brain states.

Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings / R. Comolatti, G. Hassan, E. Mikulan, S. Russo, M.A. Colombo, E. Litterio, G. Furregoni, S. D'Ambrosio, M. Fecchio, S. Parmigiani, I. Sartori, S. Casarotto, A. Pigorini, M. Massimini. - In: BRAIN STIMULATION. - ISSN 1935-861X. - 18:5(2025 Oct), pp. 1444-1454. [10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.016]

Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings

R. Comolatti
Primo
;
G. Hassan
Secondo
;
E. Mikulan;S. Russo;M.A. Colombo;E. Litterio;S. D'Ambrosio;M. Fecchio;S. Parmigiani;S. Casarotto;A. Pigorini
Penultimo
;
M. Massimini
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Background: Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Intracranial Electrical Stimulation (IES) are widely used to probe cortical excitability and connectivity, but their electrophysiological effects have never been compared. Objective: This study aims to fill this gap by using high-density scalp electroencephalogram (hd-EEG) as a common read-out to compare human brain responses to TMS and IES. Methods: The dataset includes TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) acquired from healthy subjects (n = 22) and IES-evoked potentials (IEPs) recorded from drug-resistant epileptic patients (n = 31) during wakefulness. In a subset of subjects TEPs (n = 12) and IEPs (n = 13) were also recorded during NREM sleep. Amplitude, spectral, and spatiotemporal features of TMS and IES responses, as well as their estimated electrical fields, were compared. Results: We observed marked differences between TMS and IES responses. During wakefulness, IEPs are considerably larger, slower and associated with a suppression of cortical activity, whereas TEPs are characterized by multiple waves of recurrent activation. These differences are attenuated in NREM, during which both TMS and IES elicit large EEG responses associated with a prominent suppression of cortical activity. At the global level, the spatiotemporal complexity of the responses to both TMS and IES decreases consistently following the transition from wakefulness to NREM sleep. Conclusion: Despite the limitations due to different subject populations (healthy vs pathological), our findings provide a first reference to parallel non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation and to interpret their differential effects. They also offer important insight on how cortical responsiveness is shaped by inhibition and adaptation mechanisms depending on input parameters and brain states.
No
English
Complexity; e-field simulation; EEG; intracranial electrical stimulation; Neuronal bistability; Sleep; Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
Settore BIOS-06/A - Fisiologia
Settore PSIC-01/B - Neuropsicologia e neuroscienze cognitive
Settore MEDS-12/A - Neurologia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
   NEurological MEchanismS of Injury and Sleep-like cellular dynamics (NEMESIS)
   NEMESIS
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   101071900

   EBRAINS 2.0: A Research Infrastructure to Advance Neuroscience and Brain Health (EBRAINS 2.0)
   EBRAINS 2.0
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   101147319

   Appearance, loss and recovery of tactile awareness: from physiological characterization in infants and adults to rehabilitation of stroke patients.
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   P2022FMK77_003
ott-2025
Elsevier
18
5
1444
1454
11
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings / R. Comolatti, G. Hassan, E. Mikulan, S. Russo, M.A. Colombo, E. Litterio, G. Furregoni, S. D'Ambrosio, M. Fecchio, S. Parmigiani, I. Sartori, S. Casarotto, A. Pigorini, M. Massimini. - In: BRAIN STIMULATION. - ISSN 1935-861X. - 18:5(2025 Oct), pp. 1444-1454. [10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.016]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
14
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
R. Comolatti, G. Hassan, E. Mikulan, S. Russo, M.A. Colombo, E. Litterio, G. Furregoni, S. D'Ambrosio, M. Fecchio, S. Parmigiani, I. Sartori, S. Casar...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Comolatti 2025 brain stim_PIIS1935861X25002888.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1186040
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact