This paper analyzes Italian Constitutional Court Judgment No. 192 of 2024, read in conjunction with subsequent Judgment No. 10 of 2025, which provides a definitive interpretation – more than twenty years after its introduction – of the scope and legal meaning of Article 116(3) of the Italian Constitution, as well as its relationship with Article 117(2)(m), identified by the Court as a necessary constitutional counterbalance to asymmetrical regional autonomy. The Court outlines the constitutional criteria and limitations governing the asymmetric devolution of specific legislative and administrative functions from the State to the Regions. It situates the mechanism of differentiated regionalism within the broader framework of the Italian form of State and the constitutional vision of regionalism, affirming that such devolution, grounded in the principle of subsidiarity, must respect the constitutional principles of solidarity, substantive equality, and national unity, and must be supported by adequate justification based on the criteria of administrative effectiveness and efficiency, equity in the enjoyment of civil and social rights, and democratic accountability, understood as institutional proximity.

L’epifania del regionalismo differenziato (e dei LEP): primum uniformare deinde differenziare / G. Casilli. - In: CONSULTA ONLINE. - ISSN 1971-9892. - 2025:Fasc. speciale 1(2025 Aug), pp. 175-185. (Intervento presentato al convegno In nome di quale democrazia? Come ridefinire la struttura costituzionale del potere in Italia e in Europa : 18 e 19 dicembre tenutosi a Venezia nel 2024).

L’epifania del regionalismo differenziato (e dei LEP): primum uniformare deinde differenziare

G. Casilli
2025

Abstract

This paper analyzes Italian Constitutional Court Judgment No. 192 of 2024, read in conjunction with subsequent Judgment No. 10 of 2025, which provides a definitive interpretation – more than twenty years after its introduction – of the scope and legal meaning of Article 116(3) of the Italian Constitution, as well as its relationship with Article 117(2)(m), identified by the Court as a necessary constitutional counterbalance to asymmetrical regional autonomy. The Court outlines the constitutional criteria and limitations governing the asymmetric devolution of specific legislative and administrative functions from the State to the Regions. It situates the mechanism of differentiated regionalism within the broader framework of the Italian form of State and the constitutional vision of regionalism, affirming that such devolution, grounded in the principle of subsidiarity, must respect the constitutional principles of solidarity, substantive equality, and national unity, and must be supported by adequate justification based on the criteria of administrative effectiveness and efficiency, equity in the enjoyment of civil and social rights, and democratic accountability, understood as institutional proximity.
Livelli essenziali delle prestazioni; LEP; Regionalismo differenziato; Sentenza 192/2024; Corte Costituzionale
Settore GIUR-05/A - Diritto costituzionale e pubblico
ago-2025
https://giurcost.org/contents/giurcost//studi/speciale_1_2025.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
L'epifania del regionalismo differenziato (e dei LEP)_G. Casilli.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.73 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1179719
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact