Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094 as a technological additive (functional group: silage additive) for use in fresh material for all animal species. The additive is intended for use at a proposed minimum concentration of 1 × 109 colony forming units (CFU)/kg fresh plant material. The bacterial species Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. The identity of the strain was established and no acquired antimicrobial resistance genes of concern were detected. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for all animal species, for consumers of products from animals fed with the treated silage and for the environment. Regarding user safety, the additive consists of a microorganism, and any exposure through skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. The additive was shown to be irritant for eyes, but not for skin. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that L. plantarum NCIMB 30094 at the proposed inclusion rate has the potential to improve the production of silage from all fresh plant material.

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094 for all animal species (Volac International Ltd) / R.E. Villa, G. Azimonti, E. Bonos, H. Christensen, M. Durjava, B. Dusemund, R. Gehring, B. Glandorf, M. Kouba, M. López-Alonso, F. Marcon, C. Nebbia, A. Pechová, M. Prieto-Maradona, I. Röhe, K. Theodoridou, M. Anguita, N. Bozzi Cionci, R. Brozzi, J.P. Firmino, M.L. Innocenti, J. Revez, J. Tarrés-Call, P. Valeri, Y. García-Cazorla. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 23:1(2025), pp. e9144.1-e9144.10. [10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9144]

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094 for all animal species (Volac International Ltd)

R.E. Villa
Primo
;
2025

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094 as a technological additive (functional group: silage additive) for use in fresh material for all animal species. The additive is intended for use at a proposed minimum concentration of 1 × 109 colony forming units (CFU)/kg fresh plant material. The bacterial species Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. The identity of the strain was established and no acquired antimicrobial resistance genes of concern were detected. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for all animal species, for consumers of products from animals fed with the treated silage and for the environment. Regarding user safety, the additive consists of a microorganism, and any exposure through skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. The additive was shown to be irritant for eyes, but not for skin. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that L. plantarum NCIMB 30094 at the proposed inclusion rate has the potential to improve the production of silage from all fresh plant material.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094; QPS; efficacy; safety; silage additives; technological additives;
Settore MVET-04/A - Farmacologia e tossicologia veterinaria
2025
9-gen-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EFSA Journal - 2025 - - Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30094 for.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 176.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
176.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1177529
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact