This study assesses the greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation potential of two cropping systems under the diverse pedoclimatic conditions of two sites in Northern and Southern Italy, belonging to moist and dry climate zones, respectively. The two cropping systems, implemented at field scale in silty-clay-loam soils, were an optimized cropping system (ECS), designed and managed to be more efficient in the use of nitrogen and in the conservation of soil organic carbon (SOC), and a conventional system (CCS). N2O and CO2 soil fluxes were measured daily over three to four years using automatic stations comprising eight non-steady-state chambers per site. The ARMOSA model, calibrated and validated with measured data, provided reliable simulations of GHG fluxes and crop yields, aiding environmental impact assessments. In the Northern moist site, the ECS showed a significant GHG mitigation effect, serving as a GHG sink due to reduced N2O emissions (N input-scaled emission: 0.0030 kg N-N2O kg N−1). Conversely, the CCS, despite its higher productivity and SOC storage, emitted more N2O (N input-scaled emissions 0.0051 kg N-N2O kg N−1), making it a GHG source. In the moist site ECS had an effective mitigation potential compared with CCS, while in the Southern dry site both systems had lower GHG emissions than at the moist site, due to the reduced N rates (-27 % in CCS, −33 % in ECS), thus resulting as GHG sinks. This study underscores the relevance of agronomic mitigation practices, like leguminous crops integration and optimized nitrogen management where GHG emission are fostered by site-specific pedoclimatic conditions.
Optimization of agronomic management positively affects soil GHG emission: Viable solutions of mitigation in moist and dry Mediterranean climate zones / M. Gabbrielli, M. Perfetto, M. Botta, I. Volpi, A. Castellucci, M. Ruggeri, M. Allegrezza, N. Alessi, L. Vario, M. Acutis, A. Perego, G. Ragaglini. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY. - ISSN 1161-0301. - 168:(2025 Jul), pp. 127668.1-127668.17. [10.1016/j.eja.2025.127668]
Optimization of agronomic management positively affects soil GHG emission: Viable solutions of mitigation in moist and dry Mediterranean climate zones
M. Gabbrielli
Primo
;M. Perfetto;M. Allegrezza;N. Alessi;L. Vario;M. Acutis;A. Perego;G. RagagliniUltimo
2025
Abstract
This study assesses the greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation potential of two cropping systems under the diverse pedoclimatic conditions of two sites in Northern and Southern Italy, belonging to moist and dry climate zones, respectively. The two cropping systems, implemented at field scale in silty-clay-loam soils, were an optimized cropping system (ECS), designed and managed to be more efficient in the use of nitrogen and in the conservation of soil organic carbon (SOC), and a conventional system (CCS). N2O and CO2 soil fluxes were measured daily over three to four years using automatic stations comprising eight non-steady-state chambers per site. The ARMOSA model, calibrated and validated with measured data, provided reliable simulations of GHG fluxes and crop yields, aiding environmental impact assessments. In the Northern moist site, the ECS showed a significant GHG mitigation effect, serving as a GHG sink due to reduced N2O emissions (N input-scaled emission: 0.0030 kg N-N2O kg N−1). Conversely, the CCS, despite its higher productivity and SOC storage, emitted more N2O (N input-scaled emissions 0.0051 kg N-N2O kg N−1), making it a GHG source. In the moist site ECS had an effective mitigation potential compared with CCS, while in the Southern dry site both systems had lower GHG emissions than at the moist site, due to the reduced N rates (-27 % in CCS, −33 % in ECS), thus resulting as GHG sinks. This study underscores the relevance of agronomic mitigation practices, like leguminous crops integration and optimized nitrogen management where GHG emission are fostered by site-specific pedoclimatic conditions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1161030125001649-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
5.75 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.75 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




